<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Johnny Hanson Stokes BB Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2007/11/07/johnny-hanson-stokes-bb-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2007/11/07/johnny-hanson-stokes-bb-debate/</link>
	<description>The Adams Report by JC Adams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:28:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAVID</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2007/11/07/johnny-hanson-stokes-bb-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>DAVID</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2007/11/07/johnny-hanson-stokes-bb-debate/#comment-299</guid>
		<description>As a h.I.V. COUNSELOR Talking about your health status is a very sensitive an personal topic for anyone, to go public an slander you is not a nice person they must be evil an jealous to say that about anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a h.I.V. COUNSELOR Talking about your health status is a very sensitive an personal topic for anyone, to go public an slander you is not a nice person they must be evil an jealous to say that about anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2007/11/07/johnny-hanson-stokes-bb-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 00:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2007/11/07/johnny-hanson-stokes-bb-debate/#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Who ever claims they never heard of a sexually transmitted virus called AIDS/H.I.V.
is fully of shit. The whole WORLD heard of this std called Aids,so I dont believe someone doesn&#039;t know how to get aids.UNLESS your living on a different PLANET..?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who ever claims they never heard of a sexually transmitted virus called AIDS/H.I.V.<br />
is fully of shit. The whole WORLD heard of this std called Aids,so I dont believe someone doesn&#8217;t know how to get aids.UNLESS your living on a different PLANET..?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gay Porn News Links (November 14, 2007)</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2007/11/07/johnny-hanson-stokes-bb-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Gay Porn News Links (November 14, 2007)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 08:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2007/11/07/johnny-hanson-stokes-bb-debate/#comment-297</guid>
		<description>[...] &#183; Johnny Hanson strokes BareBack Debate. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &middot; Johnny Hanson strokes BareBack Debate. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2007/11/07/johnny-hanson-stokes-bb-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2007/11/07/johnny-hanson-stokes-bb-debate/#comment-296</guid>
		<description>Honestly, I&#039;d feel hypocritical myself if I criticized either party since I consume porn. Granted, they&#039;re adults and I&#039;m not requiring them to produce porn, but I encourage them, and ultimately the continuation of bacterial and viral STD&#039;s in the human population, by paying attention to it. (this excludes porn featuring long term monogamous couples)

Now this may sound idealistic, but I believe that these diseases are containable by sheer human will, and that while it may be difficult, it&#039;s a possibility. But, unless we all decide to make changes in our values first (and permanently) and secondly, some sexual behaviors, (even if only temporarily) we&#039;re all contributors in keeping these diseases going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I&#8217;d feel hypocritical myself if I criticized either party since I consume porn. Granted, they&#8217;re adults and I&#8217;m not requiring them to produce porn, but I encourage them, and ultimately the continuation of bacterial and viral STD&#8217;s in the human population, by paying attention to it. (this excludes porn featuring long term monogamous couples)</p>
<p>Now this may sound idealistic, but I believe that these diseases are containable by sheer human will, and that while it may be difficult, it&#8217;s a possibility. But, unless we all decide to make changes in our values first (and permanently) and secondly, some sexual behaviors, (even if only temporarily) we&#8217;re all contributors in keeping these diseases going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GET REAL</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2007/11/07/johnny-hanson-stokes-bb-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>GET REAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2007/11/07/johnny-hanson-stokes-bb-debate/#comment-293</guid>
		<description>First off, what an ignorant comment to state that you can look at someone and know they are hiv+.  However, we&#039;ll just over look that one.

More importantly lets aknowledge the irony of this entire debate.  Legalized pimp daddys actually complaining that other legalized pimp daddys are making a profit off of pathetic lost souls willing to be filmed performing un-safe sex.  The whole topic of complaint amazes me.

On one side we have an example of blatant Russian Rullet.  It doesn&#039;t take a legalized pimp to tell us that.  Unless someone is a full on retard I&#039;m pretty sure they are aware of that.   On the other side we have blatant hyprocrisy being played out where those doing the complaining are saying... &quot;Hey, our whores at least shove a condom on it when fucking!&quot; What the complainers fail to mention is that  They are willingly advocating multiple sexual encounters which can be just as dangerous and deadly.  Even with a condom in play.

So if there are going to be warnings given before you watch a bareback movie ( and there should )  then also include warnings with condom movies as well. ( and there should)   You are still putting yourself at a high risk for all STD&#039;s by engaging in so called &quot;protected&quot; sex with multiple anonymous partners.

And becuase there will never be any warning signs telling viewers that you can still contract herpes, the clap, and yes even HIV with a condom on it pretty much reveals whats really going on with this pathetic bitch fight amongst all the gay porn pimp daddys.

These gay porn pimps don&#039;t give two shits in the wind about anyones safety. What they care about is &quot;profit&quot; in their pocket and publicity.  If they see one pimp daddy making a move in their territory that might challenge the sell of their own product they are going to create whatever ruse they can to get rid of the new pimp daddy in town. Suddenly protecting the viewer from a disease becomes the noble cause.  What is never pointed out is the real truth.  The viewer is of no concern.

The reason this whole debate began was over a damn award.  That in itself is so commical.  Until ALL porn participants gay or straight gladly step forward and admit that all promiscuous sex acts even with a condom can  result in death or serius bodily energy please spare us your inner fighting.  You are the last group of individuals to be pointing fingers at anyone.

So on behalf of all those who buy your films... Just shut up and film your whores and collect your money.  If you really gave half a damn about viewers of porn you&#039;d be attacking all forms of porn and the many differnt themes of sexual debauchery making a profit in your industry such as rape ( lets not even get into this one) or pedifilia in the form of watching two very young looking men work each over sexually but then putting a disclaimer saying all parties were at least 18 when the truth is they were hired because some of them looked no more than 14 or 15.

Bottom line..I love me some good porn.  BUT... I will never be stupid enough to point to that industry as an example of keeping one fully safe and healthy when it comes to the fight and prevention of all STD&#039;S.  You all mutually advocate putting someone at risk with or without condoms.  You all cator to debauchery and devalue intimacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, what an ignorant comment to state that you can look at someone and know they are hiv+.  However, we&#8217;ll just over look that one.</p>
<p>More importantly lets aknowledge the irony of this entire debate.  Legalized pimp daddys actually complaining that other legalized pimp daddys are making a profit off of pathetic lost souls willing to be filmed performing un-safe sex.  The whole topic of complaint amazes me.</p>
<p>On one side we have an example of blatant Russian Rullet.  It doesn&#8217;t take a legalized pimp to tell us that.  Unless someone is a full on retard I&#8217;m pretty sure they are aware of that.   On the other side we have blatant hyprocrisy being played out where those doing the complaining are saying&#8230; &#8220;Hey, our whores at least shove a condom on it when fucking!&#8221; What the complainers fail to mention is that  They are willingly advocating multiple sexual encounters which can be just as dangerous and deadly.  Even with a condom in play.</p>
<p>So if there are going to be warnings given before you watch a bareback movie ( and there should )  then also include warnings with condom movies as well. ( and there should)   You are still putting yourself at a high risk for all STD&#8217;s by engaging in so called &#8220;protected&#8221; sex with multiple anonymous partners.</p>
<p>And becuase there will never be any warning signs telling viewers that you can still contract herpes, the clap, and yes even HIV with a condom on it pretty much reveals whats really going on with this pathetic bitch fight amongst all the gay porn pimp daddys.</p>
<p>These gay porn pimps don&#8217;t give two shits in the wind about anyones safety. What they care about is &#8220;profit&#8221; in their pocket and publicity.  If they see one pimp daddy making a move in their territory that might challenge the sell of their own product they are going to create whatever ruse they can to get rid of the new pimp daddy in town. Suddenly protecting the viewer from a disease becomes the noble cause.  What is never pointed out is the real truth.  The viewer is of no concern.</p>
<p>The reason this whole debate began was over a damn award.  That in itself is so commical.  Until ALL porn participants gay or straight gladly step forward and admit that all promiscuous sex acts even with a condom can  result in death or serius bodily energy please spare us your inner fighting.  You are the last group of individuals to be pointing fingers at anyone.</p>
<p>So on behalf of all those who buy your films&#8230; Just shut up and film your whores and collect your money.  If you really gave half a damn about viewers of porn you&#8217;d be attacking all forms of porn and the many differnt themes of sexual debauchery making a profit in your industry such as rape ( lets not even get into this one) or pedifilia in the form of watching two very young looking men work each over sexually but then putting a disclaimer saying all parties were at least 18 when the truth is they were hired because some of them looked no more than 14 or 15.</p>
<p>Bottom line..I love me some good porn.  BUT&#8230; I will never be stupid enough to point to that industry as an example of keeping one fully safe and healthy when it comes to the fight and prevention of all STD&#8217;S.  You all mutually advocate putting someone at risk with or without condoms.  You all cator to debauchery and devalue intimacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2007/11/07/johnny-hanson-stokes-bb-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2007/11/07/johnny-hanson-stokes-bb-debate/#comment-294</guid>
		<description>you can look at his face and tell that he is poz. the guys a mess</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can look at his face and tell that he is poz. the guys a mess</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2007/11/07/johnny-hanson-stokes-bb-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 02:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2007/11/07/johnny-hanson-stokes-bb-debate/#comment-295</guid>
		<description>I work at a sex club where we show both condom and condomless porn...because there is a market for it.  Some people want to watch it.  That said, the bareback performers are most definitely HIV+, and it would be naive to think otherwise.  The real shame is that we are not really debating condom vs. condomless porn, because the bareback titles are usually so extreme.  With the major condom releases, you usually get two hot people having hot sex, but with the condomless porn it&#039;s &#039;how many loads can we shoot into so-and-so&#039;s ass/mouth?&#039;  Like the recently publicized Bjorn title, condomless porn could be more intimate instead of just being freak nasty.  Lots of real life couples have bareback sex...because they are committed and know their hiv status.  There is definitely a market for bareback porn--but how exciting is it really to watch someone siphon a tupperware of cum into someone&#039;s ass?
Like anything, though, people will do what they want, whether or not they&#039;ve been educated, and we all know abstinence-only education doesn&#039;t work.
I&#039;m glad the major condom studios are speaking out, but their porn titles are far superior and speak for themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work at a sex club where we show both condom and condomless porn&#8230;because there is a market for it.  Some people want to watch it.  That said, the bareback performers are most definitely HIV+, and it would be naive to think otherwise.  The real shame is that we are not really debating condom vs. condomless porn, because the bareback titles are usually so extreme.  With the major condom releases, you usually get two hot people having hot sex, but with the condomless porn it&#8217;s &#8216;how many loads can we shoot into so-and-so&#8217;s ass/mouth?&#8217;  Like the recently publicized Bjorn title, condomless porn could be more intimate instead of just being freak nasty.  Lots of real life couples have bareback sex&#8230;because they are committed and know their hiv status.  There is definitely a market for bareback porn&#8211;but how exciting is it really to watch someone siphon a tupperware of cum into someone&#8217;s ass?<br />
Like anything, though, people will do what they want, whether or not they&#8217;ve been educated, and we all know abstinence-only education doesn&#8217;t work.<br />
I&#8217;m glad the major condom studios are speaking out, but their porn titles are far superior and speak for themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

