<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UPDATED: Dark Alley&#8217;s GAYVN Nods for &#8220;8 1/2&#8243; Withdrawn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/</link>
	<description>The Adams Report by JC Adams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:10:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: V.J.</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/comment-page-1/#comment-1169</link>
		<dc:creator>V.J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 06:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/#comment-1169</guid>
		<description>Alex S.-  Last paragraph-
very good question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex S.-  Last paragraph-<br />
very good question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex S</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/comment-page-1/#comment-1168</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/#comment-1168</guid>
		<description>What about the fact that porn stars in both genres are not tested for HIV and many are believed to HIV+ already?

Also, many porn stars escort and there are numerous rumors that for the right price they will bareback?

We know nothing about their personal lives, so how do we know they don&#039;t bareback when they are not in front of the cameras?

Many porn stars have blogs. There have been many instances where they have mentioned people having bareback sex on sets. They have also mentioned being at parties/clubs having bareback sex with numerous people.

No matter what you producers say your performers are doing what they want when they are not being filmed. You can preach about the evils of bareback sex and the companies that produce it, but people are going to do what they want...including the guys you are hiring to perform in your condom only movies.

Answer me this. How do major stars like Carlos Morales, Eric York, and Josh Weston end up working for bareback companies when they were still getting work with condom companies if they aren&#039;t already HIV+ and if they are already HIV+, how did they become HIV+ while working in the industry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the fact that porn stars in both genres are not tested for HIV and many are believed to HIV+ already?</p>
<p>Also, many porn stars escort and there are numerous rumors that for the right price they will bareback?</p>
<p>We know nothing about their personal lives, so how do we know they don&#8217;t bareback when they are not in front of the cameras?</p>
<p>Many porn stars have blogs. There have been many instances where they have mentioned people having bareback sex on sets. They have also mentioned being at parties/clubs having bareback sex with numerous people.</p>
<p>No matter what you producers say your performers are doing what they want when they are not being filmed. You can preach about the evils of bareback sex and the companies that produce it, but people are going to do what they want&#8230;including the guys you are hiring to perform in your condom only movies.</p>
<p>Answer me this. How do major stars like Carlos Morales, Eric York, and Josh Weston end up working for bareback companies when they were still getting work with condom companies if they aren&#8217;t already HIV+ and if they are already HIV+, how did they become HIV+ while working in the industry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeWayne</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/comment-page-1/#comment-1167</link>
		<dc:creator>DeWayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/#comment-1167</guid>
		<description>But Peter that is all GayVN is
Safe Sex DVD producers Awards!

Don&#039;t get me wrong I don&#039;t want them to include Bareback( I have predicted that this biz will be mostly BB by 2009)

I want them to be inclusive and invite the Online World to the GayVN table!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Peter that is all GayVN is<br />
Safe Sex DVD producers Awards!</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong I don&#8217;t want them to include Bareback( I have predicted that this biz will be mostly BB by 2009)</p>
<p>I want them to be inclusive and invite the Online World to the GayVN table!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/comment-page-1/#comment-1166</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/#comment-1166</guid>
		<description>The people whining about bareback porn are making some mighty big assumptions.  Mostly, those assumptions are the kind that a fearful HIV-negative person would make. Of course there are circumstances in which two men should be allowed to fuck raw if they choose.  Faithful/monogamous boyfriends, for one.  I also think that if two HIV-positive dudes want to screw raw, more power to them.  Being HIV-positive has almost no benefits otherwise--why not have sex the way sex was meant to be, if that&#039;s what you want?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The people whining about bareback porn are making some mighty big assumptions.  Mostly, those assumptions are the kind that a fearful HIV-negative person would make. Of course there are circumstances in which two men should be allowed to fuck raw if they choose.  Faithful/monogamous boyfriends, for one.  I also think that if two HIV-positive dudes want to screw raw, more power to them.  Being HIV-positive has almost no benefits otherwise&#8211;why not have sex the way sex was meant to be, if that&#8217;s what you want?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Z</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/comment-page-1/#comment-1165</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/#comment-1165</guid>
		<description>So, DeWayne, are you proposing that someone should hold the &quot;Deadly Sex DVD Producers Awards&quot;?

Gee, what would some of those categories be?√¢‚Ç¨¬¶The Best HIV Carrier Award; or the best Three-way Infection Award; or perhaps even, the Best Anal Warts Award?

And no need for a Lifetime Achievement Award, because most bareback actors don√¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢t live too long anyway.

That wasn√¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢t meant to be funny or in bad taste.  I was just trying to point out the absurdity of the idea that the GayVNs should be known as the Safe Sex DVD Producers Awards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, DeWayne, are you proposing that someone should hold the &#8220;Deadly Sex DVD Producers Awards&#8221;?</p>
<p>Gee, what would some of those categories be?√¢‚Ç¨¬¶The Best HIV Carrier Award; or the best Three-way Infection Award; or perhaps even, the Best Anal Warts Award?</p>
<p>And no need for a Lifetime Achievement Award, because most bareback actors don√¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢t live too long anyway.</p>
<p>That wasn√¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢t meant to be funny or in bad taste.  I was just trying to point out the absurdity of the idea that the GayVNs should be known as the Safe Sex DVD Producers Awards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeWayne</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/comment-page-1/#comment-1164</link>
		<dc:creator>DeWayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/#comment-1164</guid>
		<description>I wonder Jim if an Oscar nominee was facing such serious charges if they would withdraw the nomination? It will be a HUGE embarrassment if he wins an award!

My problem with GayVN they only represent about 40% of Gay Porn! Bareback I understand the exclusion but what about the Online Sites (Sean Cody,Corbin,Chaosmen etc)

GayVN should be known as the Safe Sex DVD producers Awards that is all they represent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder Jim if an Oscar nominee was facing such serious charges if they would withdraw the nomination? It will be a HUGE embarrassment if he wins an award!</p>
<p>My problem with GayVN they only represent about 40% of Gay Porn! Bareback I understand the exclusion but what about the Online Sites (Sean Cody,Corbin,Chaosmen etc)</p>
<p>GayVN should be known as the Safe Sex DVD producers Awards that is all they represent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/comment-page-1/#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/#comment-1163</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but last I checked there is no constitutional right to a GAYVN award. Or even a nomination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but last I checked there is no constitutional right to a GAYVN award. Or even a nomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Z</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/comment-page-1/#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/#comment-1162</guid>
		<description>Jim, regarding Nikolay: I believe -- and correct me if I&#039;m wrong -- that in this country you are innocent until proven guilty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, regarding Nikolay: I believe &#8212; and correct me if I&#8217;m wrong &#8212; that in this country you are innocent until proven guilty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/comment-page-1/#comment-1161</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/#comment-1161</guid>
		<description>If making bareback porn were a crime, Dark Alley would be awaiting trial too.

So, it&#039;s hard to justify a real distinction there IMO; the fact of a bad act being a crime gives it a pre-trial window of opportunity for getting a GAYVN award.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If making bareback porn were a crime, Dark Alley would be awaiting trial too.</p>
<p>So, it&#8217;s hard to justify a real distinction there IMO; the fact of a bad act being a crime gives it a pre-trial window of opportunity for getting a GAYVN award.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricci</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/comment-page-1/#comment-1160</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/#comment-1160</guid>
		<description>u di have a point vis-a-vis Petrov, but as long as one isn&#039;t convicted one isn&#039;t guilty i suppose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>u di have a point vis-a-vis Petrov, but as long as one isn&#8217;t convicted one isn&#8217;t guilty i suppose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/comment-page-1/#comment-1159</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/#comment-1159</guid>
		<description>You know, since hitting elderly folks over the head with a hammer is not exactly setting a good public health example either...I am sitting here wondering why Nikolay Petrov is still a nominee, while Dark Alley is not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, since hitting elderly folks over the head with a hammer is not exactly setting a good public health example either&#8230;I am sitting here wondering why Nikolay Petrov is still a nominee, while Dark Alley is not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Z</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/comment-page-1/#comment-1158</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/#comment-1158</guid>
		<description>Well, Allan, if you&#039;re seriously comparing smoking a cigarette on film to having bareback sex on film, then their supposed assumption is right -- you ARE stupid.  But you are, Blanche, you are!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Allan, if you&#8217;re seriously comparing smoking a cigarette on film to having bareback sex on film, then their supposed assumption is right &#8212; you ARE stupid.  But you are, Blanche, you are!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/comment-page-1/#comment-1157</link>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/#comment-1157</guid>
		<description>Here we have the beginning of the death of porn as a fantasy.  Not like I pay attention to these stupid awards, anyway, but now that they&#039;re openly admitting that they only want to talk about films that tow the propaganda line, there&#039;s even less of a reason to take them seriously.  What&#039;s next?  Oscar refusing to nominate movies in which someone smokes a cigarette?  This bareback &quot;controversy&quot; assumes that viewers of these films are stupid.  They assume the worst about people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we have the beginning of the death of porn as a fantasy.  Not like I pay attention to these stupid awards, anyway, but now that they&#8217;re openly admitting that they only want to talk about films that tow the propaganda line, there&#8217;s even less of a reason to take them seriously.  What&#8217;s next?  Oscar refusing to nominate movies in which someone smokes a cigarette?  This bareback &#8220;controversy&#8221; assumes that viewers of these films are stupid.  They assume the worst about people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: desslock</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/comment-page-1/#comment-1156</link>
		<dc:creator>desslock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/#comment-1156</guid>
		<description>I think the egg is on the event sponsor&#039;s face for listing the films originally. This gives the impression no one there knows what is going on.   Rather than debating condom policy, why not discuss credibility?

El Rancho contains marketing notes and even a disclaimer at the movie&#039;s beginning stating that one scene is bareback.   There&#039;s nothing sneaky about it, except that it is a fabulous movie.

But then going through the GayVN nomination list that I printed out off their website several weeks ago includes movies that were released in 2006 and 2005 --- plus under Best Oral Scene, Raging Stallion&#039;s GRUNTS is listed  followed by a cast of Titan models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the egg is on the event sponsor&#8217;s face for listing the films originally. This gives the impression no one there knows what is going on.   Rather than debating condom policy, why not discuss credibility?</p>
<p>El Rancho contains marketing notes and even a disclaimer at the movie&#8217;s beginning stating that one scene is bareback.   There&#8217;s nothing sneaky about it, except that it is a fabulous movie.</p>
<p>But then going through the GayVN nomination list that I printed out off their website several weeks ago includes movies that were released in 2006 and 2005 &#8212; plus under Best Oral Scene, Raging Stallion&#8217;s GRUNTS is listed  followed by a cast of Titan models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/comment-page-1/#comment-1155</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/#comment-1155</guid>
		<description>Keith, what are you talking about? You are insane if you think condomless sex is inherently &quot;unsafe&quot;. MOST people do not use condoms and are entirely safe from diseases, and unless some facts about human biology changes, (e.g. spontaneous germination) they will always be because their behavior and lifestyles allow that.

In a &quot;civilized&quot; society, cars or motorcycles would not exist because of their negative effects of the environment among other factors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith, what are you talking about? You are insane if you think condomless sex is inherently &#8220;unsafe&#8221;. MOST people do not use condoms and are entirely safe from diseases, and unless some facts about human biology changes, (e.g. spontaneous germination) they will always be because their behavior and lifestyles allow that.</p>
<p>In a &#8220;civilized&#8221; society, cars or motorcycles would not exist because of their negative effects of the environment among other factors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/comment-page-1/#comment-1154</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/#comment-1154</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;To Lee at 11.07, what about when people are too stupid, selfish or soulless to modify their behaviour? Are you suggesting condoms have no use at all?&lt;/i&gt;

None! I seriously don&#039;t know what makes condom mafia think that people who don&#039;t accept the best tools out there of avoiding disease - abstinence, monogamy preceded by disclosure and testing, and if need be, (relationships where one or both parties has a disease) alternative sex practices, think people are going to follow their advise to wear a condom. It&#039;s insane logic. Stop making excuses for people who don&#039;t change their behavior and acting as if some artificial barrier is going to provide a permanent fix to a serious problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>To Lee at 11.07, what about when people are too stupid, selfish or soulless to modify their behaviour? Are you suggesting condoms have no use at all?</i></p>
<p>None! I seriously don&#8217;t know what makes condom mafia think that people who don&#8217;t accept the best tools out there of avoiding disease &#8211; abstinence, monogamy preceded by disclosure and testing, and if need be, (relationships where one or both parties has a disease) alternative sex practices, think people are going to follow their advise to wear a condom. It&#8217;s insane logic. Stop making excuses for people who don&#8217;t change their behavior and acting as if some artificial barrier is going to provide a permanent fix to a serious problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/comment-page-1/#comment-1153</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/#comment-1153</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the point of these stupid ass awards anyways?..It&#039;s not like they make tons more money like the oscars!..lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the point of these stupid ass awards anyways?..It&#8217;s not like they make tons more money like the oscars!..lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Webb</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/comment-page-1/#comment-1152</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/#comment-1152</guid>
		<description>Sorry, the last line should read....

The entire equation changes when you are paying people to perform dangerous sex acts and you are commercially exploiting those acts for profit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, the last line should read&#8230;.</p>
<p>The entire equation changes when you are paying people to perform dangerous sex acts and you are commercially exploiting those acts for profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Webb</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/comment-page-1/#comment-1151</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/#comment-1151</guid>
		<description>Lee-  You are confusing what people chose to do in their personal and private lives versus the commercial exploitation of unsafe sex for profit.

In a civilized society we do not risk the lives and well being of others just to make a quick buck...even if the person is willing to do so for money.  At the very least we must do whatever we can to mitigate the dangers when we are paying people to perform potentially dangerous sex acts.

We require drivers to wear seat belts. We require miners to wear helmets and other safety equipement.  There are plenty of people desperate enough for money or too stupid for their own good that would work without a helmet or safety equipment.  But, in a civilized society we do not allow them to risk their health/lives for our profit and entertainment.

The entire equation changes when you are paying people to perform dangerous sex acts and your are commericlaly expoliting those acts for profit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee-  You are confusing what people chose to do in their personal and private lives versus the commercial exploitation of unsafe sex for profit.</p>
<p>In a civilized society we do not risk the lives and well being of others just to make a quick buck&#8230;even if the person is willing to do so for money.  At the very least we must do whatever we can to mitigate the dangers when we are paying people to perform potentially dangerous sex acts.</p>
<p>We require drivers to wear seat belts. We require miners to wear helmets and other safety equipement.  There are plenty of people desperate enough for money or too stupid for their own good that would work without a helmet or safety equipment.  But, in a civilized society we do not allow them to risk their health/lives for our profit and entertainment.</p>
<p>The entire equation changes when you are paying people to perform dangerous sex acts and your are commericlaly expoliting those acts for profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EdWoody</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/comment-page-1/#comment-1150</link>
		<dc:creator>EdWoody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/02/13/dark-alleys-gayvn-nods-for-8-12-withdrawn/#comment-1150</guid>
		<description>No, Matt is 100% wrong. I am a GayVN judge, and I know and can prove that I was told about 8 1/2&#039;s disqualification long before the voting closed. There is no way the number of votes cast affected that, and any votes that had already been cast were discounted.

The same goes for the scene in &quot;El Rancho&quot; by Kristen Bjorn, the scene Anonymous at 8.46 is thinking of. That too has been disqualified. The Jarics&#039; scene in &quot;Endless Crush&quot; is not bareback.

To Lee at 11.07, what about when people are too stupid, selfish or soulless to modify their behaviour? Are you suggesting condoms have no use at all?

I am with Peter Z, Chi Chi and GayVN all the way on this one. I will grant that GayVN should have caught this long before the film was nominated, but at least it was caught eventually, and they took the appropriate action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Matt is 100% wrong. I am a GayVN judge, and I know and can prove that I was told about 8 1/2&#8242;s disqualification long before the voting closed. There is no way the number of votes cast affected that, and any votes that had already been cast were discounted.</p>
<p>The same goes for the scene in &#8220;El Rancho&#8221; by Kristen Bjorn, the scene Anonymous at 8.46 is thinking of. That too has been disqualified. The Jarics&#8217; scene in &#8220;Endless Crush&#8221; is not bareback.</p>
<p>To Lee at 11.07, what about when people are too stupid, selfish or soulless to modify their behaviour? Are you suggesting condoms have no use at all?</p>
<p>I am with Peter Z, Chi Chi and GayVN all the way on this one. I will grant that GayVN should have caught this long before the film was nominated, but at least it was caught eventually, and they took the appropriate action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

