Comments on: Michael Lucas Challenges GAYVN Wins

By: ricci

ricci — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:08:04 +0000

absolutely

By: Will

Will — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:10:29 +0000

To Naprem, et al: So porn stars should be seen and not heard, right? In case you’re unaware, Lucas writes a blog, which demands regular content, so he’s supplying it. It’s his blog and he’ll rant if he wants to!

By: naprem

naprem — Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:00:38 +0000

Wow, this guy really just does not know when to shut up, does he?

By: cass-fan

cass-fan — Fri, 22 Feb 2008 05:25:44 +0000

LOU CASS was robbed of the “Best Non-Sexual Performance” AWARD this year.
that man has been in that biz for over 20 YEARS and has not appeared in an adult film
for 17 YEARS.
Look at Mr. CASS’ performance in Falcon’s “DARE”, he should be starring in hollywood mainstream films.

I can now see that these awards
are ‘rigged’

We LOVE you Mr. CASS!!!

By: Pornus Addictus

Pornus Addictus — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:02:52 +0000

Grunts : maybe best all-sex video.? Come off it; there’s more sex in one chichi scene than in the whole bunch of grunts. Grunts had men to die for but what they did came out of a dispenser: automatic fuck and suck pilot.
Gigolo? Script? Hullo? Scorching sex? Hullo? Even the scene between arpad miklos and that twink (super combination and good-looking p√É¬¢ir) was all but riveting, enticing or sexy…really a missed chance. also the final bang in the movie was ‘all in the dark’…

By: Casey Scott

Casey Scott — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 05:08:36 +0000

I wouldn’t usually defend Michael Lucas’ egotism, but…he’s right this time! GIGOLO was the best film of the Best Picture nominees, technically beautiful, the sex was scorching, script wonderful, acting top-notch. I don’t know how GRUNTS won Best Picture. Maybe Best All-Sex Video, sure, but for a Best Picture win at the AVN’s, I expect a storyline, mainstream-level production value, and acting. GRUNTS had none of these. And Lucas should have won Best Actor, too; Ray Star was indeed quite wonderful in the film, too.

By: Jason

Jason — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:43:39 +0000

LOL..Can U say “WHO GIVES A FUCK”!!!..I rented the Intern…MOVIE SUCKED..didn’t even waste my $2.00 on the other one..LOL!

By: Sinu'

Sinu' — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:18:38 +0000

Well I preferred ‘Gigolo’ because it had a story, unlike ‘The Intern’ which was about a parade of mincing queens in/out of an office!

By: Sinu'

Sinu' — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:18:38 +0000

Well I preferred ‘Gigolo’ because it had a story, unlike ‘The Intern’ which was about a parade of mincing queens in/out of an office!

By: Peter Z

Peter Z — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 04:37:41 +0000

Botox poisoning???

By: Alan

Alan — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:29:41 +0000

Does this man ever say anything positive? What a boner-killer he is.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:29:37 +0000

I’m puzzled about something. “The Intern” won Best Renting Title but Lucas is disputing it because “Gigolo” sold more? Well, if “Intern” was rented more times by consumers than “Gigolo” then the award should stand and is therefore accurate. Am I missing something?

Is it possible “Gigolo” was rented less but actually sold more copies? Something is askew.

Do studios actually see royalties from titles rented by the public verses the money they make directly from an actual sale of a title?

It seems possible that more people chose to rent “Intern” than actually buy the DVD for their personal libraries.

Does anyone else see how odd this all is or should we really even care? Haha

By: T-Bird

T-Bird — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:53:35 +0000

I tend to like the Lucas movies but it sounds like to me he is pissed off because his movies did not sweep the awards like in years past. Heaven forbid another company should get credit for a movie that had nothing to do with Lucas.
Get over yourself Mister Ego, guess you finally realized that your not the only fish in the pond.

By: Peter Z

Peter Z — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:12:46 +0000

“…a serious storyline…” LOL!

By: Critical Eye

Critical Eye — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:01:57 +0000

yes, and that his duty.
i’m not so keen on michael lucas’s statement either especially as both movies but espeically gigolo weren’t that smahingly good.
intern was better than gigolo which sex scenes were pretty unexciting withnthat boring gay for pay guy tripps, even the scene between lucas and ridge wasn’t that good, and this had more to do with the directing and filming (final scene was impossible to look at dark and dark and dark.
The intern had at least a good scene between ridge and vargas and cristian cruz bottoming as the best slut ever……
u either make film or porn combining both is very tough to do. Both the intern and gigolo had sort of good story lines (read ‘sort of’) but the sex has to be spicy, enticing, erotic, fascinating, hot, and well-filmed too.
Moreover i’m blind according to the CEO as the cover of gigolo isn’t hot at all, any caravaggio painting is 1000 times as hot.
Lucas is again right about tiger tyson though….oh, dear ‘hall of fame’? The guy hazrdly made three good movies and they were all in the very beginning of his career.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:21:09 +0000

Fuck, I am SO sick of coming here and reading about Michael Lucas. JC, I love the new design of this site, but are you going to write about this guy every time he farts?

By: Bill in S.F.

Bill in S.F. — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:16:23 +0000

Enough with this guy already. (I, too, have a problem with the “retard” comment.) He’s free to complain all he likes. But that seems to be all he does, complain. This perpetual victimhood thing is wearing thin. Even when I agree with him (his rebuttal of the Stanford students protesting him last week was spot on), I want to disagree just on principle.

- Bill in S.F.

By: Douglas

Douglas — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:12:09 +0000

“Even a retard”???

Mr. Lucas certainly has his sensitivity to the mentally-challenged held well in check. In any event, his evaluation of his performance in La Dolce Vita is on the nose.