<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Falcon Isn&#8217;t Going Bareback (Really)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/</link>
	<description>The Adams Report by JC Adams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:14:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/comment-page-1/#comment-1792</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/#comment-1792</guid>
		<description>Amen Wendy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen Wendy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotwendywilliams</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/comment-page-1/#comment-1766</link>
		<dc:creator>hotwendywilliams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 02:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/#comment-1766</guid>
		<description>I think companys that proclaim to be CONDOM only if they then switch to facials, cum swapping, or anything close should take the next step and require A.I.M testing of ALL talent and for it to be updated every 30 days just as they do on the &quot;straight&quot; side.  I really wish that companies would go this route whether condom or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think companys that proclaim to be CONDOM only if they then switch to facials, cum swapping, or anything close should take the next step and require A.I.M testing of ALL talent and for it to be updated every 30 days just as they do on the &#8220;straight&#8221; side.  I really wish that companies would go this route whether condom or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/comment-page-1/#comment-1789</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/#comment-1789</guid>
		<description>Uh, do they even test the actors? If not, why should that fact bother anyone more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, do they even test the actors? If not, why should that fact bother anyone more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/comment-page-1/#comment-1794</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 15:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/#comment-1794</guid>
		<description>i noticed that nobody has mentioned the fact that Josh Weston did a bareback title and now has done another Falcon title.  Does that bother anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i noticed that nobody has mentioned the fact that Josh Weston did a bareback title and now has done another Falcon title.  Does that bother anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/comment-page-1/#comment-1788</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 13:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/#comment-1788</guid>
		<description>claim &quot;with&quot; full certitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>claim &#8220;with&#8221; full certitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/comment-page-1/#comment-1791</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 13:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/#comment-1791</guid>
		<description>BTW, observe that you completely omitted the disclosure part and disregarded that order that I suggested. You&#039;re not even replying to what I said when you do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, observe that you completely omitted the disclosure part and disregarded that order that I suggested. You&#8217;re not even replying to what I said when you do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/comment-page-1/#comment-1793</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 13:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/#comment-1793</guid>
		<description>&quot;Rather than a deviant that purposely infects others by poking holes in condoms√¢‚Ç¨¬¶ I think it is more likely that person might accidentally infect another trusting that their status is negative&quot;.

No, what you &quot;think&quot; is that essentially there is no way for anyone to claim will full certitude that they are HIV negative. Be honest. When you cut out the bs, that&#039;s ultimately what you  are saying - that anyone having sex without condoms and remaining HIV negative does so in spite of their precautions, (luck basically, hence the ignorant phrase calculated &quot;risk&quot;) not because of them. But what you are saying is not supported by medical fact or common sense. There is no hesitation to talk about the &quot;need&quot; to &quot;educate&quot; on proper use of condoms, but so many want to pretend that there is no proper way to have sex without condoms. I can only chalk it up to propaganda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Rather than a deviant that purposely infects others by poking holes in condoms√¢‚Ç¨¬¶ I think it is more likely that person might accidentally infect another trusting that their status is negative&#8221;.</p>
<p>No, what you &#8220;think&#8221; is that essentially there is no way for anyone to claim will full certitude that they are HIV negative. Be honest. When you cut out the bs, that&#8217;s ultimately what you  are saying &#8211; that anyone having sex without condoms and remaining HIV negative does so in spite of their precautions, (luck basically, hence the ignorant phrase calculated &#8220;risk&#8221;) not because of them. But what you are saying is not supported by medical fact or common sense. There is no hesitation to talk about the &#8220;need&#8221; to &#8220;educate&#8221; on proper use of condoms, but so many want to pretend that there is no proper way to have sex without condoms. I can only chalk it up to propaganda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magus</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/comment-page-1/#comment-1790</link>
		<dc:creator>magus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 07:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/#comment-1790</guid>
		<description>Greetings from Germany.
Well, actually I do not get the point. Do you all really believe that people at home have safe sex when the gay porn movies they watch  only show safe sex? And do you really believe that people change their behavior because they watch bareback movies.? I am sorry, but this really makes me laugh.
I personally think that today the influence of the gay porn industry in the sexual behavior of the people is far less influential than you think. I do not change my sexlife just because I see a bareback movie.
There was a time when it was important to show the gay community that you can have safe sex and still have fun.
Today people know that bareback is dangerous and will kill them and they know that they should practice safe sex, even if they watch bareback movies. I certainly do.

But there are two additional points I would like to add to the discussion:
1. If bareback movies in gay porn really will be accepted, who will protect the models being forced to make bareback movies to make a living and risk there life?

2. Is it not more dangerous to present people movies as safe sex movies and then use unsafe practice  and create a wrong impression of safe sex which is not true?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings from Germany.<br />
Well, actually I do not get the point. Do you all really believe that people at home have safe sex when the gay porn movies they watch  only show safe sex? And do you really believe that people change their behavior because they watch bareback movies.? I am sorry, but this really makes me laugh.<br />
I personally think that today the influence of the gay porn industry in the sexual behavior of the people is far less influential than you think. I do not change my sexlife just because I see a bareback movie.<br />
There was a time when it was important to show the gay community that you can have safe sex and still have fun.<br />
Today people know that bareback is dangerous and will kill them and they know that they should practice safe sex, even if they watch bareback movies. I certainly do.</p>
<p>But there are two additional points I would like to add to the discussion:<br />
1. If bareback movies in gay porn really will be accepted, who will protect the models being forced to make bareback movies to make a living and risk there life?</p>
<p>2. Is it not more dangerous to present people movies as safe sex movies and then use unsafe practice  and create a wrong impression of safe sex which is not true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Cruz</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/comment-page-1/#comment-1775</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Cruz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/#comment-1775</guid>
		<description>correction: Although I still think your scenarios are a little paranoid and UNlikely- I one thing I can√¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢t say about you is that you lack intelligence.

GRAMMAR?!! LOL! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>correction: Although I still think your scenarios are a little paranoid and UNlikely- I one thing I can√¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢t say about you is that you lack intelligence.</p>
<p>GRAMMAR?!! LOL! <img src='http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Cruz</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/comment-page-1/#comment-1783</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Cruz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/#comment-1783</guid>
		<description>Lee.
Although I still think your scenarios are a little paranoid and likely- I one thing I can&#039;t say about you is that lacking intelligence. You seem like a smart guy who&#039;s informed... and its good when people keep me on my toes, so thanks.

I stand by the guidelines on my site at howiroll.info. These were written by the STOP AIDS Project of San Francisco because I don&#039;t pretend to public health expert.

Personally I do disagree with your calculated risk scenario though. With most HIV tests, as I understand, there is a window of 1-3 months when the HIV virus may be present but yet undetectable. A person may be infected and still not yet know it until their next test. If two negative guys sero-sort and then bareback this is a very likely scenario for sero-conversion. Rather than a deviant that purposely infects others by poking holes in condoms... I think it is more likely that person might accidentally infect another trusting that their status is negative. Because of this indeterminate window, this is why the recommendation for &#039;negative&#039; guys is to always use condoms, to be most sure.

Thanks again for keeping me on my toes, I admire your spirit. And I encourage you, if you don&#039;t already... to use it in some way in the community. We may not agree, but the more of us out there doing our part to stop the spread of HIV, the better.

Best to you.
SC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee.<br />
Although I still think your scenarios are a little paranoid and likely- I one thing I can&#8217;t say about you is that lacking intelligence. You seem like a smart guy who&#8217;s informed&#8230; and its good when people keep me on my toes, so thanks.</p>
<p>I stand by the guidelines on my site at howiroll.info. These were written by the STOP AIDS Project of San Francisco because I don&#8217;t pretend to public health expert.</p>
<p>Personally I do disagree with your calculated risk scenario though. With most HIV tests, as I understand, there is a window of 1-3 months when the HIV virus may be present but yet undetectable. A person may be infected and still not yet know it until their next test. If two negative guys sero-sort and then bareback this is a very likely scenario for sero-conversion. Rather than a deviant that purposely infects others by poking holes in condoms&#8230; I think it is more likely that person might accidentally infect another trusting that their status is negative. Because of this indeterminate window, this is why the recommendation for &#8216;negative&#8217; guys is to always use condoms, to be most sure.</p>
<p>Thanks again for keeping me on my toes, I admire your spirit. And I encourage you, if you don&#8217;t already&#8230; to use it in some way in the community. We may not agree, but the more of us out there doing our part to stop the spread of HIV, the better.</p>
<p>Best to you.<br />
SC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/comment-page-1/#comment-1776</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/#comment-1776</guid>
		<description>Babe, it&#039;s no more PARANOID than thinking ALL incidents of condomless sex are &quot;health risks&quot;. You are unsurprisingly calm and collected when it comes time to rationalize a choice you made.
When taking the proper precautions that anyone (even those using condoms) should take before engaging in sex acts, which in this order include: disclosure of sexual history, testing, waiting, (if applicable) disclosure of any present sexual affairs unknown to sexual partners followed by testing and waiting again, what pray tell is the problem here if all negative parties participate in sex without a condom? Can&#039;t think of anything, can you? The only way you could is by projecting paranoia or negative intentions on at least one of the parties..gee. much like I illustrated with the theoretical person poking holes in condom. It goes both ways. And I&#039;m sorry Steve if what I&#039;m saying is causing you grief. But I have zero freakin&#039; tolerance for the propaganda I&#039;m seeing that rests upon sloppy thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Babe, it&#8217;s no more PARANOID than thinking ALL incidents of condomless sex are &#8220;health risks&#8221;. You are unsurprisingly calm and collected when it comes time to rationalize a choice you made.<br />
When taking the proper precautions that anyone (even those using condoms) should take before engaging in sex acts, which in this order include: disclosure of sexual history, testing, waiting, (if applicable) disclosure of any present sexual affairs unknown to sexual partners followed by testing and waiting again, what pray tell is the problem here if all negative parties participate in sex without a condom? Can&#8217;t think of anything, can you? The only way you could is by projecting paranoia or negative intentions on at least one of the parties..gee. much like I illustrated with the theoretical person poking holes in condom. It goes both ways. And I&#8217;m sorry Steve if what I&#8217;m saying is causing you grief. But I have zero freakin&#8217; tolerance for the propaganda I&#8217;m seeing that rests upon sloppy thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Cruz</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/comment-page-1/#comment-1768</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Cruz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/#comment-1768</guid>
		<description>I stand corrected and change my statement to &quot;its the most effective way to prevent HIV.&quot;

What you should know is condoms are 98% effective when used properly. Those are damn good odds! Always check the expiration date and use compatible lube and lots of it, just to be smart.

As for poking holes in condoms as to purposely infect someone with HIV. Isn&#039;t that just a bit paranoid? Sounds more like a plot from a movie thank a situation most of us might run into.
But just in case carry your own condoms and that should solve that issue. -Good grief!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand corrected and change my statement to &#8220;its the most effective way to prevent HIV.&#8221;</p>
<p>What you should know is condoms are 98% effective when used properly. Those are damn good odds! Always check the expiration date and use compatible lube and lots of it, just to be smart.</p>
<p>As for poking holes in condoms as to purposely infect someone with HIV. Isn&#8217;t that just a bit paranoid? Sounds more like a plot from a movie thank a situation most of us might run into.<br />
But just in case carry your own condoms and that should solve that issue. -Good grief!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/comment-page-1/#comment-1767</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/#comment-1767</guid>
		<description>&quot;It√¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢s the only way to be sure you√¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢ll stay that way&quot;.

Does lying get you off? You can pretend that condom is a magic bullet all you want, but the fact remains that you are not screwing ALONE. You&#039;re doing it WITH another person and you are required just like a person doing it without barrier to ascend your faith to another person. Have you ever heard of chicks in ostensibly trusting relationships poking tiny holes in condoms to get knocked up? That&#039;s just ONE example (involving the corrodible condom) showing the ignorance of believing that if you got rubber, you&#039;ve got no fears. It ain&#039;t cast iron, buddy. If you&#039;re with a SOB with that doesn&#039;t care about your health, you&#039;re with with a SOB that doesn&#039;t care - condom present or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It√¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢s the only way to be sure you√¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢ll stay that way&#8221;.</p>
<p>Does lying get you off? You can pretend that condom is a magic bullet all you want, but the fact remains that you are not screwing ALONE. You&#8217;re doing it WITH another person and you are required just like a person doing it without barrier to ascend your faith to another person. Have you ever heard of chicks in ostensibly trusting relationships poking tiny holes in condoms to get knocked up? That&#8217;s just ONE example (involving the corrodible condom) showing the ignorance of believing that if you got rubber, you&#8217;ve got no fears. It ain&#8217;t cast iron, buddy. If you&#8217;re with a SOB with that doesn&#8217;t care about your health, you&#8217;re with with a SOB that doesn&#8217;t care &#8211; condom present or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/comment-page-1/#comment-1769</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/#comment-1769</guid>
		<description>Critical Eye seems to want to be in denial of the facts.  This is a factual blog called &quot;hard news&quot; and the fact is that Damon Kruezer scooped everyone on this story and its lead-in.  Or has JC Adams interviewed Todd Montgomery recently as Kruezer did?

No, I didn&#039;t think so. You have to give Kruezer the respect he&#039;s earned or else just admit you&#039;re a bigot for some undefined reason.  I doubt if Damon cares though, he&#039;s unquestionably got some of the biggest names in the industry talking with or working with him directly or indirectly.  I guess they know something you don&#039;t!  LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Critical Eye seems to want to be in denial of the facts.  This is a factual blog called &#8220;hard news&#8221; and the fact is that Damon Kruezer scooped everyone on this story and its lead-in.  Or has JC Adams interviewed Todd Montgomery recently as Kruezer did?</p>
<p>No, I didn&#8217;t think so. You have to give Kruezer the respect he&#8217;s earned or else just admit you&#8217;re a bigot for some undefined reason.  I doubt if Damon cares though, he&#8217;s unquestionably got some of the biggest names in the industry talking with or working with him directly or indirectly.  I guess they know something you don&#8217;t!  LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/comment-page-1/#comment-1787</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/#comment-1787</guid>
		<description>Steve...

You are to be commended. What a great site. You really need to push this into the gay centers as much as you can. I&#039;m sure you&#039;re already doing that, but you&#039;ve really got something great there. You are doing the True Good Work. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve&#8230;</p>
<p>You are to be commended. What a great site. You really need to push this into the gay centers as much as you can. I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re already doing that, but you&#8217;ve really got something great there. You are doing the True Good Work. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: will</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/comment-page-1/#comment-1771</link>
		<dc:creator>will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/#comment-1771</guid>
		<description>Casey Scott -- I agree with everything you say, but remember with HIV the tiniest microscopic amount of semen can potentially be as deadly as a mouthful. I&#039;m just trying to understand where  Chi Chi and others decide a line must be drawn, and why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Casey Scott &#8212; I agree with everything you say, but remember with HIV the tiniest microscopic amount of semen can potentially be as deadly as a mouthful. I&#8217;m just trying to understand where  Chi Chi and others decide a line must be drawn, and why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Cruz</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/comment-page-1/#comment-1786</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Cruz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/#comment-1786</guid>
		<description>Ultimately the consumer has the final say in this argument. From the real guys I talk to about this subject, I get the feeling that the community has just grown complacent with safer sex. That&#039;s why we have turned barebacking into a fetish rather than recognizing it as a health risk. Its not just HIV, you can also get Hep C from having unsafe sex... and there is currently no vaccine for Hep C.

My personal feelings aside, we can all bitch at the studios for where they each draw the line of prevention... but as individuals WE make the  choice where we spend that dollar. I say that as the sales of barebacking porn continue to rise... if there were no longer a market this argument would be moot.

As we all try to figure out what works for us... my hope is that we don&#039;t lose sight of the most important goal: stopping the spread of HIV. Regardless of what seems hot in moment... if youre HIV Negative always use a condom. It&#039;s the only way to be sure you&#039;ll stay that way. Until there&#039;s a cure.

Get the facts at howiroll.info, a free site I created because I want to see an end to HIV in my lifetime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ultimately the consumer has the final say in this argument. From the real guys I talk to about this subject, I get the feeling that the community has just grown complacent with safer sex. That&#8217;s why we have turned barebacking into a fetish rather than recognizing it as a health risk. Its not just HIV, you can also get Hep C from having unsafe sex&#8230; and there is currently no vaccine for Hep C.</p>
<p>My personal feelings aside, we can all bitch at the studios for where they each draw the line of prevention&#8230; but as individuals WE make the  choice where we spend that dollar. I say that as the sales of barebacking porn continue to rise&#8230; if there were no longer a market this argument would be moot.</p>
<p>As we all try to figure out what works for us&#8230; my hope is that we don&#8217;t lose sight of the most important goal: stopping the spread of HIV. Regardless of what seems hot in moment&#8230; if youre HIV Negative always use a condom. It&#8217;s the only way to be sure you&#8217;ll stay that way. Until there&#8217;s a cure.</p>
<p>Get the facts at howiroll.info, a free site I created because I want to see an end to HIV in my lifetime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/comment-page-1/#comment-1770</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/#comment-1770</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m as disgusted by this as many you appear to be. It makes me sick to read the justifications for carrying pre-condom movies and making anything less than 100% safe sex movies today. It&#039;s so ridiculous and obscene.  HIV is awful. It hasn&#039;t changed.  My partner is a therapist to many many recently HIV diagnosed clients and they are morally, physically and psychologically destroyed.  It is not a &#039;little thing&#039; it is life changing in the worst way possible and IT&#039;S AVOIDABLE. I don&#039;t get this death threat gay men have.  Yes, death threat.  They are playing Russian Roulette and it&#039;s partial self-hate and sometimes, the meth addiction.  Facing that head on with compassionate but ruthless tactics is the key...it&#039;s hard to enjoy jerking off to porn anymore!  Everyone is drinking spunk and taking unprotected cock up the ass...it&#039;s like we long for 1976 and boys...THOSE DAYS ARE GONE.  I makes me so mad and sick.  If you wanna fuck (and God bless you for it) PUT A RUBBER ON THE DICK.  End of story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m as disgusted by this as many you appear to be. It makes me sick to read the justifications for carrying pre-condom movies and making anything less than 100% safe sex movies today. It&#8217;s so ridiculous and obscene.  HIV is awful. It hasn&#8217;t changed.  My partner is a therapist to many many recently HIV diagnosed clients and they are morally, physically and psychologically destroyed.  It is not a &#8216;little thing&#8217; it is life changing in the worst way possible and IT&#8217;S AVOIDABLE. I don&#8217;t get this death threat gay men have.  Yes, death threat.  They are playing Russian Roulette and it&#8217;s partial self-hate and sometimes, the meth addiction.  Facing that head on with compassionate but ruthless tactics is the key&#8230;it&#8217;s hard to enjoy jerking off to porn anymore!  Everyone is drinking spunk and taking unprotected cock up the ass&#8230;it&#8217;s like we long for 1976 and boys&#8230;THOSE DAYS ARE GONE.  I makes me so mad and sick.  If you wanna fuck (and God bless you for it) PUT A RUBBER ON THE DICK.  End of story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/comment-page-1/#comment-1772</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/#comment-1772</guid>
		<description>If the directors wanted to be completely safe, then they should do blowjobs with condoms as well. But that simply won&#039;t happen, despite the fact that HIV can still be transmitted this way. I think it&#039;s up to the performers, really, if they want to open their mouths during a facial or go back for seconds post-orgasm.

It should be noted that Chi Chi&#039;s the director who has his performers simply stand and jerk off usually instead of actually reach orgasm together with their partner. Talk about a mood killer!

And no, Will, not all oral scenes feature ingestion of pre-cum. Not all men can pre-cum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the directors wanted to be completely safe, then they should do blowjobs with condoms as well. But that simply won&#8217;t happen, despite the fact that HIV can still be transmitted this way. I think it&#8217;s up to the performers, really, if they want to open their mouths during a facial or go back for seconds post-orgasm.</p>
<p>It should be noted that Chi Chi&#8217;s the director who has his performers simply stand and jerk off usually instead of actually reach orgasm together with their partner. Talk about a mood killer!</p>
<p>And no, Will, not all oral scenes feature ingestion of pre-cum. Not all men can pre-cum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Critical Eye</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/comment-page-1/#comment-1773</link>
		<dc:creator>Critical Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/03/26/falcon-isnt-going-bareback-really/#comment-1773</guid>
		<description>can this &#039;kreuzer stalker&#039; please quit...would be a relief</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can this &#8216;kreuzer stalker&#8217; please quit&#8230;would be a relief</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

