[Edits 4:30 pm.] In case you hadn’t heard, silver-haired daddybear Jake Cruise has bagged another prize: hetero-identified Mike Roberts. The strikingly handsome, blue-eyed stunner allows Mr. Cruise to pop his buttsex cherry onscreen in a vignette that begins streaming June 20 (click here). This follows Jake Cruise bagging Zeb Atlas (click here) and Brodie Sinclair, among others. “While the ‘Gay For Pay’ moniker continues to pack ‘em in (despite our endless grumbling),” GayPornBlog asked today, “could its days finally be numbered?” I’d say no, as the hetero-identified performer is a major-league draw in the new Wild West of internet porn. What I’m not sure about is whether gay-for-pay is legitimately popular again with consumers, or whether the early success a few sites enjoyed with the fetish has spawned a kind of gold rush in the race to snag a piece of the internet pie. [H/T GayPornBlog.]


Comments

37 Comments so far

  1. Will on June 13, 2008 4:40 pm

    I think that’s the only bad picture I’ve ever seen of Roberts, where Jake is molesting him. He looks white as a ghost and like he’s about ready to pass out.

  2. Anonymous on June 13, 2008 4:51 pm

    What’s the name of the scene? Senior Citizen Sex? I think Jake Cruise is the epitome of what is wrong with the gay porn industry. He is over the hill and long in the tooth – the only way he can have sex with studs like this is to pay them and then call it pornography. Way gross. Thanks for the heads up again JC – I know what to stay the hell away from.

  3. Douglas on June 13, 2008 6:09 pm

    Geeze Louise, I’d love to see Mike Roberts get plowed by someone attractive! Jake Cruise is sexy to Jake Cruise, and a few daddy-fetishists. Yawn!

  4. Danny on June 13, 2008 6:45 pm

    REPULSIVE WOULD BE TOO KIND A WORD TO DESCRIBE THIS MESS!!

  5. Everson on June 13, 2008 7:25 pm

    No Fucking Way that is disgusting why Jake Cruise it would of ben 100 times better if it was any other mainstream porn star not old ass Jake Cruise Mike Roberts has been in so many studio now he want to bottom for an old fart never look at him the same.

  6. Anonymous on June 13, 2008 8:59 pm

    EWWWWWW!

  7. Critical Eye on June 13, 2008 11:56 pm

    we’re age-ists and so jealous of Jake Cruise, listen i don’t like to watch it either but i have no problem of an older guy fucking a youngbie, only why put it on film…guess he has money enough of his own…

  8. Sinu' on June 14, 2008 1:06 am

    Brodie Sinclair, Zeb Atlas & now Mike Roberts its rather like the gay novel: ‘Ghostly Gay Trilogy!

  9. Sinu' on June 14, 2008 1:06 am

    Brodie Sinclair, Zeb Atlas & now Mike Roberts its rather like the gay novel: ‘Ghostly Gay Trilogy!

  10. Anonymous on June 14, 2008 1:18 am

    I am neither ageist nor jealous of this troll. Watching two attractive men having sex is enormously arousing no matter what their age or age difference. Yet, once again, the human anti-Viagra destroys what could have been a very hot encounter by insisting on casting himself as Mike Roberts’ cherry-popper. (Let’s all take a few moments to throw up in our mouths a bit.) Think of how much more business JC could generate if he’d only stay in the one position that’s at all tolerable…behind the camera.

  11. chrissypoo on June 14, 2008 8:33 am

    I think JC behind the camera is a great idea. If he wants to have sex with the models, do like every other amateur gay porn producers does – have sex with them between takes, fluff them, have sex with them before the shoot in an audition or after the shoot. Generally models don’t mind putting out for the guy writing the checks.

  12. Anonymous on June 14, 2008 10:15 am

    I mean no offense. I will admit that I don’t find Jake attractive and I wrote EWWWWW before. I will also admit that the only difference between him having sex on camera with his performers and owning the company versus Michael Lucas doing the same is that Lucas is attractive. I think people need to fess up to their bias just like I did now.

  13. Will on June 14, 2008 11:55 am

    Anonymous – OK, I’ll take that one on! There are actually two huge differences with Lucas:

    a)He was a successful porn star BEFORE he owned his own company, thus legitimizing his subsequent on-camera appearances.

    b)There is a great likelihood that his current on-screen partners also find him attractive, thus legitimizing etc.

    However, I will admit that he seems to save the most attractive “auditioners’ for himself!

  14. Cock Addict on June 14, 2008 1:01 pm

    I think ML best days are now over and he’s far too overexposed in his dvd’s anyway

  15. Will on June 14, 2008 1:27 pm

    Cock Addict – I hope, at least, that he’ll have the sense to stay put behind the camera when he senses there is no longer a market for his on-camera appearances.

  16. Kdogg on June 14, 2008 4:02 pm

    uhhh PUKE. Why Mike why?????

  17. Will on June 14, 2008 4:23 pm

    Kdogg – $$$$$$$

  18. Anonymous on June 14, 2008 4:30 pm

    Will,

    I see your point too. Thanks for taking it on!

  19. jc on June 14, 2008 11:43 pm

    Why is someone jealous of Jake Cruise. He gets to fuck a guy that will do anything for money. Old guys with money have their choice of desperate guys. There are lots of crackheads and hustlers with hot bodies available for diry old men with money.

  20. Youngbee on June 15, 2008 1:43 am

    Why is everyone indeed so age-ist here? Why is an older guy who has sex with a younger man immediately called ‘ a dirty old man’?
    Believe me there must be a bunch of ‘dirty old men’ on this blog….

  21. Will on June 15, 2008 12:03 pm

    Why are people who dislike Jake automatically accused of ageism? Does he get a pass because of his age? That is reverse discrimination!

  22. rich on June 15, 2008 12:10 pm

    I don’t think anyone here is age-ist. Look-ist — now that’s another story. If Jake Cruise looked like 58-year-old Keith Carradine I’d be all over that shit.

    Click my name to see caps of Keith’s nude scene from Dexter.

  23. Will on June 15, 2008 1:19 pm

    JUST got through watching 1st season of Dexter! No spoilers please!

  24. Douglas on June 15, 2008 4:35 pm

    Kids, I’m 58, and my days as a hottie are far behind me. I enjoy having sex with the occassional daddy-loving younger man. I’m all for guys my age, and older, having all the sex we can manage.

    BUT NOT ON CAMERA! I wouldn’t buy porn with me in it, nor with someone who looks like me in it. That’s why I watch porn, to see guys who are still worth watching. If I want to watch a guy in his 50s have sex, I’ll look in the mirror. There ARE men my age and even older who I would enjoy watching (Harrison Ford? I’m still waiting for INDIANA JONES AND THE QUEENDOM OF THE CRYSTAL DILDOES.), but not Jake Cruise.

    Cruise is indulging his ego here, as it can’t remotely be considered commerical. He’s bragging on camera that HE got Roberts’s cherry. (Frankly, I have always found cherries overrated. Experienced lovers are so much better.) But what is there to brag about? That he met Roberts’s price? It’s certainly not that Roberts took one look at him and said, “Why have I been wasting myself on women when there’s Jake Cruise in the world? Fuck me sir!”

    Frankly, watching Roberts top a cute guy (In the extremely few films where he consented to touch another man intimately) is a million times hotter than watching Jake’s Viagra’d dick make Roberts uncomfortable. A hot man having to suppress his natural revulsion isn’t my idea of hot sex.

  25. T Bird on June 15, 2008 7:20 pm

    Here we go again with the “Celine Dion Husband Porn Star Conquest……..again” I think Mike Roberts is a hot ass guy and would love to see with someone, someone that is besides a dead ringer for Celine Dion’s husband Rene’ LOL!
    First Brody, and then Ego-riffic Atlas and now Mike Roberts ?
    You know what would make a great headline…
    ‘Jake Cruise has sex with a porn star and does not pay!!’ Tho I still would not see it let alone pay but it would surprise me none the less.

  26. Will on June 16, 2008 10:08 am

    Trouble is brewing in GayPornLsnd, it appears. I would post this in the more relevant Zeb Atlas/Cruise story, but since more people are likely to see it here. . .

    Matt Rush just posted this on ATKOL in the thread about his scene with Atlas in upcoming Falcon video. According to Forest, only the oral scene has been shot, full-on sex to be filmed in late July (?!):

    OK, so I have to chime in and put in my two cents. I was excited to work with Zeb because on a personal level, we are friends and I thought the muscle on muscle would be hot and it was. I know a lot of you are going to shoot it down and tear it apart. You have every right to. My complaint is that this movie was supposed to be Zeb’s first man on man scene, going all the way. Things were set in stone and ready to go then he goes and does the whole thing with Jake Cruise. That was a HUGE slap in the face to me. If Zeb was going to sell out at least sell out to someone other than Jake Cruise! He could have at least waited till our scene was already shot before he did his thing with Jake.
    It’s the same stunt that Jason Adonis pulled when he did his bottoming scene with Erik Rhodes. Erik was supposed to be his first but he wasn’t. If Erik or I would have pulled a stunt like that, we would have been canned. I guess being openly gay and proud and loyal for 9 years means nothing.

  27. Will on June 16, 2008 10:15 am

    Sorry, should have explained that Forest is David Forest, Atlas’ agent, who also posted in the thread.

  28. rich on June 16, 2008 11:58 am

    I wonder how many other of Falcon’s gay actors are pissed about being treated like second class citizens.

  29. PJ on June 16, 2008 3:11 pm

    If people think Jake Cruise is creepy, it’s his own fault. He’s always framing shots so that his hand sort of wanders into the shot to fondle his models. It really does make his advances and his participation unwelcome, as if he’s stealing gropes. Jake Cruise is such a major boner-killer for me because of this. It feels abusive somehow. Not a turn-on for me.

  30. Will on June 16, 2008 3:39 pm

    Additional post from Matthew Rush in ATKOL forum:

    I don’t know why we didn’t shoot the scene all at once. The first scene went well and I’m sure the second scene will be even hotter. No matter how hot it turns out to be, the whole scene is tainted because of the Jake Cruise incident. I got stuck in a good deal that went bad.

    I felt betrayed by Zeb because he could have anyone in the scene he wanted but he chose me to be in his first man on man scene. Falcon had bent over backwards and met his “demands” then he goes and does his first scene with Jake.
    The least Falcon could have done was cut his pay in half. In my opinion, he should have been cut from the scene. Neither happened. Granted I’m old news but I’d still like to think that a company that I have been loyal to for almost 10 years would have handled it in a different manner. I feel I got the short end of the stick and I was royally fucked with a sandpaper dildo.

    Everyone goes on and on about gay for pay this and gay for pay that. The thought of a straight guy getting it on with another guy may look hot on paper but when it comes down to it, it makes for a much harder and longer scene to shoot. No one ever takes that into consideration. As long as the gay community keeps supporting “Gay for Pay” actors, they are going to continue to take advantage of us and screw the companies over.

  31. Douglas on June 16, 2008 4:23 pm

    Wow. I’ve always liked Matt Rush, but what an articulate, intelligent, well-reasoned, and self-effacing argument. “Granted, I’m old news…” what full-of-himself- egotistic porn diva would post such a remark? Rush has always displayed a fun sense of humor, and certainly has always come across as out-and-proud, but reading his Zeb Atlas-Jake Cruise rant makes me like and respect him even more.

    One question. What does ATKOL stand for? I’d like to check out his postings for myself.

    Bravo Matt Rush. I’m going to turn this computer off, put on one of your videos, and touch myself inappropriately, while thinking how much I like you.

    As for gay-for-pay performers, some of them, Rod Barry is a prime example, make themselves welcome guests in our world, because they are attitude-free, professional, and supportive. They’re never condescending to be performing for us.

    Some think they are God’s Gift to Gay Men. They are not.

    I do not get any charge out of knowing a performer is straight but playing gay. If they can get into it, so I can’t detect it as I watch, fine. If their lack of enthusiasm makes for a listless, bored, performance (RC Ryan, I’m talking about YOU. Mike Roberts, you are beautiful, but you don’t play gay convincingly.), they can stay home.

    As for Zeb Atlas. Jake Cruise can have the egotistical bonehead. In fact, Atlas can go fuck himself. At least that will be True Love.

  32. Will on June 16, 2008 5:04 pm

    Douglas – I used to know the answer about ATKOL’s name, but can’t find it right now. And you can just go to atkol.com to see his postings in the Zeb Atlas thread under Favorite Videos/Pornstars.

  33. Bill in S.F. on June 16, 2008 6:38 pm

    ATKOL is an acronym that stands for “A Tasty Kind Of Love,” a flavored gel they distributed 20 years ago to make condoms taste better. Do a search in the upper left corner and the info is in the first story that pops up (about Citibeur).

  34. Ricci on June 17, 2008 7:26 am

    I’m a fervent opponent to the gay4pay shit, as long as there are gay4gay pornstars in need of work it should indeed NOT happen at all…..

  35. Will on June 17, 2008 9:24 am

    Just a short update on the Matt Rush dustup:

    Now apparently it’s come to light that Todd Montgomery, departed head of Falcon, knew all about the Atlas/Cruise deal and kept the info to himself, so Rush is now trying to bury the hatchet with Atlas.

  36. Will on June 17, 2008 10:08 am

    OH. MY. GOD.

    Now I don’t know what to think. ATKOL has just removed all of the “Matt Rush” posts and declared the poster an impostor!!!!

    First, I am shocked at this development because I was under the impression that ATKOL had very strict safeguards in place to prevent such things from occurring. Apparently not too effective in this instance.

    Second, I probably shouldn’t have jumped the gun in reposting the bogus Matt Rush postings here, and want to apologize to JCA and readers for that.

    Bur how was I to know? This controversy is probably not over.

  37. wills friend on June 17, 2008 11:02 pm

    Will you are an excellent observer, and yes those atkol goings on are strange!

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Speak your mind