Comments on: Michael Lucas on Swallowing and “Sterile Sex” Onscreen

By: Dandy

Dandy — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:59:26 +0000

Dear Ass Freak,
Eighteen year olds are adults, according to the law. Otherwise, they would not be able to perform legally in porn. I know 18 year olds that are wise beyond their age and and 5o year olds that are stuck in perpetual childhood. Should we monitor the 50 year olds who are barebacking in porn as we do the 18 year olds? At what age are you mature enough to asess the risks of your own sexual behavior without the input of the bareback police?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 12 Jul 2008 20:39:44 +0000

What happened to people taking responsibility for their own actions? Why is it the responsibility of the porn studios to make sure that people are practicing safe sex? It’s sad that we live in a country that’s always trying to pass blame on to other people when it’s ourselves that need to step and be responsible for our own actions!

By: rich

rich — Sat, 12 Jul 2008 16:45:44 +0000

All this drama over swallowing… Hello! Matthew Rush got sick recently from eating ass. How come nobody’s calling for a ban on butt licking?

Could it be because the no swallow police are really into to ass eating, and they don’t want to give it up — even though porn actors put their health at risk every time they do it?

By: Alan

Alan — Sat, 12 Jul 2008 16:14:33 +0000

People who think bareback should banned are just censors by another name. The notion that porn audiences are going to imitate what they see on the screen in incredibly patronizing.

Furthermore, the outdated implication that HIV is a death sentence is incredibly insulting and demoralizing for all the people who are living, and thriving, with it.

The bareback police really piss me off. Their lofty, we-know-best attitude is the same one I’ve been fighting in the Bible Bangers for years.

By: Ass Freak

Ass Freak — Sat, 12 Jul 2008 08:20:41 +0000

an 18-year old an adult? Ur nuts most 18 year olds are emotionally still kids, they HAVE to be protected against themselves. Live and let live does not apply always to the best effect of humankind….

By: Dandy

Dandy — Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:28:37 +0000

Whether you like it or not, an 18 year old can make the decision to take loads up his ass. He is an adult. If his is doing it camera it is very likely that he is doing it in his personal life. Mabye I am aptathetic. I believe in “live and let live.” If bareback sex is against your morals and ethics then dont bareback and dont purchase/watch porn that features bareback. Fortunately everyone does not share the same ethics and morals.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:50:02 +0000

This is not just about OSHA and the laws, or lack of them. This is about ethics and how we choose to treat other human beings. Especially ones that are being paid to perform potentially unsafe sex acts. Where have we gone as a community that we are okay with paying some 18 year old kid $300 to take loads up his ass for our entertainment! Then trying to justify it by saying, well it√¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢s his decision! That√¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢s just pathetic and shows how complacent and apathetic we have become as a community.

By: Will

Will — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:21:45 +0000

Carol – Some might say they are the same thing. (Not me, Carol.)

By: Carol Brunette

Carol Brunette — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 07:10:45 +0000

I suggest we bring back Snuff films

That will settle the bareback issue once and forever!

By: Dandy

Dandy — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 02:03:57 +0000

Fortunately, or unfortunately, depending on your point of view,porn is not regulated by OHSA. If porn was regualted as Anonomyous on July 10 suggests it woould not be long before they regulated gay porn out of business.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 22:08:58 +0000

The above analysis is correct. Anyone who disagrees is wrong.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:50:27 +0000

Okay, this idea that you should let models do whatever they want to do, even if it√¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢s dangerous, is just ridiculous! There are plenty of dimwitted or just plain desperate miners that would gladly go down in a coal mine without a hardhat or safety equipment for the right money. But guess what folks we don’t let them! When you are paying another human being to perform a potentially dangerous act, you have a moral and ethical obligation to mitigate any risk. These are commercially exploited sexual acts we are talking about, not personal and private encounters between two adults! You need to separate what people choose to do in their private lives, versus commercially exploited sexual acts.

By: Pornus Addictus

Pornus Addictus — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:41:40 +0000

and attention to gum problems. And u can’t get HIV from deep kissing, why do so many people not know what safe sex (read how not to get HIV) is about? The other sexual diseases are another matter. Moreover referring to some anonymous RSS has produced some of the most sterile movies ever: yes, it looks hard, they use leather and whatever but that doesn’t make it less sterile, los tof thre sex is soooooo mechanical, read so sterile, so badly faked, so unnatural (hear the stupid sound) etcetc

By: Pornus Addictus

Pornus Addictus — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:38:18 +0000

Bareback should be banned at once and this by law. Oral cumsots aren’t risky if the rules (as said by ML)are followed no swallowing

By: Peter

Peter — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:26:12 +0000

I thought that I had read somewhere that no-one had ever contracted aids from swallowing cum. Is this not valid info anymore?

Also I thought that to contract aids from anal intercourse you have someone cum up your butt. Porn performers dont do that. So is’nt their risk of catching aids nearly non existant?

By: Whirlwind of Positivity

Whirlwind of Positivity — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:19:57 +0000

Hooray for Michael Lucas for admitting that he has had the same risky sex that his models do. It takes a man of a certain caliber to–hmmm? What’s that? He only admitted to using condoms? He didn’t say if he took oral cumshots and swallowed?

But I know Michael would be fair about this. I mean, I haven’t seen many of his films, but he would never ask an employee…someone who he makes money off of…to do something risky that he himself wouldn’t do. I mean, HE has taken an oral cumshot in one of his films, right?

Right??

By: Eat My Ginch

Eat My Ginch — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:29:08 +0000

Dandy & July 9th’s Anonymous are absolutely right. The models are adults and if they want to perform risky sex, do meth on camera or cut themselves up with rusty razors and bleed all over their partners, they should be allowed to do so. It’s not like their behavior will be copied by impressionable fans. And as long as both performers and the porn studio are okay with it, then there’s absolutely nothing morally wrong with it. I’m sure Dandy and 7/9 Anon would love to watch Zeb Atlas shooting up while he’s taking a cum shot in his mouth and being beaten with a baseball bat and called “faggot” as much as the rest of us. Hey, if they’re at peace with it, then it’s okay!

By: Kdogg

Kdogg — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:00:58 +0000

anon, not just among gays, straight are also going to get the latest epidemic.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 09 Jul 2008 23:39:49 +0000

It is the choice of the performers to do bareback or not. They know the risks. No one is forcing them. After all, the performers are adults. The studios have a right to produce the kind porn they choose. If a performer does not agree to bareback for the “meager” pay, they are free to move on. If you don’t think that the studios are being responsible, don’t watch the porn they produce.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 09 Jul 2008 23:28:23 +0000

dandy,

So do you not care that gay boys and gay men are DYING?

The CDC reported a couple weeks ago that a second HIV/AIDS epidemic is coming.

I think responsibility must lie somewhere and the studios can be raunchy and tasteful at the same time without risking lives for what amounts to very meager pay.