Comments on: John Paulus to Close Clay Aiken Blog

By: imthefly

imthefly — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:51:01 +0000

shut up claymates. god damn you’re everywhere. FUCK!

By: Mike

Mike — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 05:51:10 +0000

Really? He had a blog about it? Seriously? How bored and desperate for attention is this man? Who cares if Clay Aiken is gay? I don’t. He ugly and a bad singer. Seriously, people need to start re-evaluating their priorities.

By: Ricci

Ricci — Sun, 28 Sep 2008 19:32:13 +0000

couldn’t care less both he and Vasquez are very poor performers

By: hornydiablo

hornydiablo — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 04:20:34 +0000

If you haven’t seen John Paulus’ interview and sex scene for Lucas, it’s worth checking out. He seems really distressed when talking about how Clay manhandled him, kept trying to stuff his cock up his ass without a condom, and then fled the hotel room as fast as he could.

He looks even more disappointed when Lucas decides not to fuck him and instead turns over the duties to Wilson Vasquez who seems a little shy and not exactly thrilled to be having Clay Aiken’s sloppy seconds.

By: Douglas

Douglas — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 01:44:01 +0000

The whole of my interest in Clay Aikin could be placed in the nucleus of an atom, and still leave enough room for the Empire State Building, but this guy is as smarmy a slice of self-promoting sleazey cheese as I’ve ever seen. Polite people do not promote themselves by outing other people and making hay out of kissing-and-telling. And now these smarmy, holier-than-thou, I’ve-forgiven-them-all crapola statements stink like a one-week corpse.

This guy deserves no attention, since attention is what he was after all along.

By: Will

Will — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 01:43:54 +0000

rabbit – I agree with everything you just posted, except for one point: American Idol is NOT a lame reality show! It is my reason for living.

ARCHIE RULES!!!

By: rabbit on the moon

rabbit on the moon — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 01:14:22 +0000

Anonymous 1:20 pm, running to the National Enquirer about an alleged sexual encounter he had with someone from a lame reality show is not what I call ‚Äútaking the high road‚Äù. And I use the word ‚Äúalleged‚Äù because I‚Äôve always believed John Paulus was lying about a couple of facts. I’m not a Clay Aiken fan, but I read a lot about this story a couple of years ago. If he really wanted to take the high road, he never would‚Äôve made this situation public, nor would he have devoted an entire blog to Clay. Stalker much? Not to mention keeping a nasty cum rag of his. That‚Äôs just gross. I don‚Äôt understand why some people portray John as some sort of victim. He‚Äôs nothing but a mentally unstable individual who decided to obtain popularity by revealing that he slept with a famous person.

By: Not a Claymate

Not a Claymate — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 23:36:46 +0000

God Bless America for making someone famous for fucking a celebrity and nothing more. God, I love this country.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:38:20 +0000

Some of those Claymates were fucking vicious, although let’s be honest and say that Paulus was a bit weird himself, so it’s interesting, if boring, that he’s being so restrained about his vindication.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:20:46 +0000

Good for him for trying to take the high road, I guess…

By: Will

Will — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:58:05 +0000

His posting about Aiken’s People cover had one of the longest comment threads I’ve ever seen. Who knew he had that many readers?