<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Straight Guys, Gay Porn: &#8220;Men&#8221; Mag Responds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/11/18/straight-guys-gay-porn-men-mag-responds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/11/18/straight-guys-gay-porn-men-mag-responds/</link>
	<description>The Adams Report by JC Adams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:14:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pissed!</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/11/18/straight-guys-gay-porn-men-mag-responds/comment-page-2/#comment-24771</link>
		<dc:creator>Pissed!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 21:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/?p=4043#comment-24771</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t give a damn about how nice a straight boy is or that he adores his fans or that he treats everybody so kind and lovely. To hell with that. Gay magazines, gay movies, gay awards, etc., should be about gay people. Not gay-pretending-to-be straights. I think it does a diservice to our community when award is given to someone for their gay role and the person is straight. It&#039;s like hiring a white guy to play a black role and then giving him an award for it. Straight porn directors need to increase the male salaries to keep their straight boys.  Gay porn directors need to take a stand against this non-sense and not hire straight boys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t give a damn about how nice a straight boy is or that he adores his fans or that he treats everybody so kind and lovely. To hell with that. Gay magazines, gay movies, gay awards, etc., should be about gay people. Not gay-pretending-to-be straights. I think it does a diservice to our community when award is given to someone for their gay role and the person is straight. It&#8217;s like hiring a white guy to play a black role and then giving him an award for it. Straight porn directors need to increase the male salaries to keep their straight boys.  Gay porn directors need to take a stand against this non-sense and not hire straight boys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Men Magazine reveals Man of the Year &#124; Male-Erotika.com</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/11/18/straight-guys-gay-porn-men-mag-responds/comment-page-2/#comment-16394</link>
		<dc:creator>Men Magazine reveals Man of the Year &#124; Male-Erotika.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 10:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/?p=4043#comment-16394</guid>
		<description>[...] making him the third straight man in a row to win the Men Mag Man of the Year title. Some people aren&#8217;t too happy about that. Unzipped Media issued a statement: One of the comments on your blog goes right to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] making him the third straight man in a row to win the Men Mag Man of the Year title. Some people aren&#8217;t too happy about that. Unzipped Media issued a statement: One of the comments on your blog goes right to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/11/18/straight-guys-gay-porn-men-mag-responds/comment-page-2/#comment-14082</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/?p=4043#comment-14082</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no such thing as gay for pay.  Men having sex with other men in real life or on film are bi or gay.  If you want to fantasize that a man having gay sex is straight, go right ahead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no such thing as gay for pay.  Men having sex with other men in real life or on film are bi or gay.  If you want to fantasize that a man having gay sex is straight, go right ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/11/18/straight-guys-gay-porn-men-mag-responds/comment-page-2/#comment-13328</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 21:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/?p=4043#comment-13328</guid>
		<description>I like my men gay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like my men gay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thurberman</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/11/18/straight-guys-gay-porn-men-mag-responds/comment-page-2/#comment-9865</link>
		<dc:creator>Thurberman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 20:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/?p=4043#comment-9865</guid>
		<description>Hi,
 First of all, what a great blog subject. I am really moved and impressed by some of things I read. Now my confession: Holy Father I am a black man who like gay for pay sites. I can&#039;t help myself. 

1.  I think they are playing to a great many fanaties we all have about being with a straight male. Some of us stopped being a virgin because of a straight male. Some of us always wished  for that straight male to be our boyfriend. And some of us think that sexuality is a fluid thing and money  isn&#039;t everything and no one is that good of an actor. But it is still a fanatsy. 

2. If say we find Hugh Jackman, or Justin Timberlake, or Will Smith hot does it matter that they are straight? Is there some self- loathing in being attracted to a celebrity?
Of course not. We are attracted to the fantasy of the handsome straight boy being gay or being fucked because we feel fucked over by him. And we would all like to think that maybe he is one us. Or that his beauty would make us look like a beauty. Gay men  have to get over being 14 year old girls. 

3. Gay for pay is also a reminder of the first straight guy you ever had sex with. He was young. You were young. You went to school together or lived in the same neighborhood. Maybe Boys&#039; Scout. But it usually is the college drunk night or the &quot; then one night in the army..&quot; tale. These guys remind you of that guy or guys- depending  on where you lived. They are young, frat -looking kind of guys. Some sites have trashier guys. ( I always wondered how they meet these guys  and what these guys are getting out it besides money and some notice.)

4. I also love to dream freely about their real background. On the surface they could call be hookers. Porn&#039;s image is not like Disney&#039;s. We  have all seen porn where we knew the guy was an addict of some sort and this was his way  of making  a deal. But those guys  don&#039;t last. The ones that  do stay must be arosed by the sex in some way, not just linked to money. And that is why I like gay for pay. I use my imagination  on the man at hand. He could be straight, he could be gay  or he could be bi. I want the fanatsy backstory and the chemisty to hit a nut. All else is for a therpist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
 First of all, what a great blog subject. I am really moved and impressed by some of things I read. Now my confession: Holy Father I am a black man who like gay for pay sites. I can&#8217;t help myself. </p>
<p>1.  I think they are playing to a great many fanaties we all have about being with a straight male. Some of us stopped being a virgin because of a straight male. Some of us always wished  for that straight male to be our boyfriend. And some of us think that sexuality is a fluid thing and money  isn&#8217;t everything and no one is that good of an actor. But it is still a fanatsy. </p>
<p>2. If say we find Hugh Jackman, or Justin Timberlake, or Will Smith hot does it matter that they are straight? Is there some self- loathing in being attracted to a celebrity?<br />
Of course not. We are attracted to the fantasy of the handsome straight boy being gay or being fucked because we feel fucked over by him. And we would all like to think that maybe he is one us. Or that his beauty would make us look like a beauty. Gay men  have to get over being 14 year old girls. </p>
<p>3. Gay for pay is also a reminder of the first straight guy you ever had sex with. He was young. You were young. You went to school together or lived in the same neighborhood. Maybe Boys&#8217; Scout. But it usually is the college drunk night or the &#8221; then one night in the army..&#8221; tale. These guys remind you of that guy or guys- depending  on where you lived. They are young, frat -looking kind of guys. Some sites have trashier guys. ( I always wondered how they meet these guys  and what these guys are getting out it besides money and some notice.)</p>
<p>4. I also love to dream freely about their real background. On the surface they could call be hookers. Porn&#8217;s image is not like Disney&#8217;s. We  have all seen porn where we knew the guy was an addict of some sort and this was his way  of making  a deal. But those guys  don&#8217;t last. The ones that  do stay must be arosed by the sex in some way, not just linked to money. And that is why I like gay for pay. I use my imagination  on the man at hand. He could be straight, he could be gay  or he could be bi. I want the fanatsy backstory and the chemisty to hit a nut. All else is for a therpist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/11/18/straight-guys-gay-porn-men-mag-responds/comment-page-2/#comment-6598</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/?p=4043#comment-6598</guid>
		<description>Gay for pay?

Please, Reese Rideout is just gay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gay for pay?</p>
<p>Please, Reese Rideout is just gay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/11/18/straight-guys-gay-porn-men-mag-responds/comment-page-2/#comment-6544</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/?p=4043#comment-6544</guid>
		<description>Wow.  I think a lot of guys here are overreacting.  Reese is a beautiful guy.  People like to look at him.  If you don&#039;t want to look at him, then don&#039;t.

I&#039;m also perplexed by the idea that MEN Magazine should use gay models.  Why?  It&#039;s a private organization - the publisher can choose whatever models he wants - and then even tell you that YOU choose the &quot;Man Of The Year&quot;, when you might not have had anything to do it at all!

If you don&#039;t like the idea of &quot;gay for pay&quot;, then don&#039;t support companies that promote it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  I think a lot of guys here are overreacting.  Reese is a beautiful guy.  People like to look at him.  If you don&#8217;t want to look at him, then don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also perplexed by the idea that MEN Magazine should use gay models.  Why?  It&#8217;s a private organization &#8211; the publisher can choose whatever models he wants &#8211; and then even tell you that YOU choose the &#8220;Man Of The Year&#8221;, when you might not have had anything to do it at all!</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t like the idea of &#8220;gay for pay&#8221;, then don&#8217;t support companies that promote it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paintncanvas</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/11/18/straight-guys-gay-porn-men-mag-responds/comment-page-2/#comment-6523</link>
		<dc:creator>Paintncanvas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/?p=4043#comment-6523</guid>
		<description>You know the sad fact is we have made this who gay for pay industry there used to be models who had huge cocks and were getting paid their rate to have honest gay sex. If a model was straight or gay for pay we would say he was bi to solidify his base of gay male fans. We never felt as if anything was being taken away from the community. It was common practice that gay models were paid more than straight women they were our audience and then came the gay for pay scene and totally blew all that out of wack. Now we have openly gay men competeing for Top dollar for gay for pay models we have made the shift from being powerful and having and industry to opening the door to people who spit in our face but are willing to earn a paycheck off our community. We blow up their egos destroy our community piece by piece we have turned everything we do into a fetish. It went from gay sex to I won&#039;t have sex with blacks,I won&#039;t have sex with Asians and Latins,He can only suck me off,He can&#039;t fuck me,Some one brought up the cd industry and only liking a few songs.When you were buying music you were buying a concept and entire concept this song by song crap is stupid you have a bunch of ipods with pieces of someone&#039;s work. What happened to listening to the entire album and understanding what the music meant. Now every one is trying to sell HITS.That&#039;s what&#039;s happening to Porn Your being told gay for pay is a hit. Straight men fucking men is hotter than gay men fucking men.You have all with your stupid marketable fetishes and predjudices have made barebacking an industry again. Why is bareback so popular again. Because alot of men feel that it&#039;s the only place where they can be sure that Gay men are actually having gay sex.No race issues and gay for pay. It&#039;s sad really we took away the thing that made us powerful and gave it away and in it&#039;s place sprung something dangerous that was just killing us a decade or 2 at rising numbers. I could care less about these straight for pay assholes. I want quality porn with gay men. Stop trying to sell me a HIT to line your wallet. I want a concept that doesn&#039;t make me feel less that I&#039;m a gay man. Like the asshole who used to beat me up when I was kid can now fuck me if I count out the correct amount of money from my wallet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know the sad fact is we have made this who gay for pay industry there used to be models who had huge cocks and were getting paid their rate to have honest gay sex. If a model was straight or gay for pay we would say he was bi to solidify his base of gay male fans. We never felt as if anything was being taken away from the community. It was common practice that gay models were paid more than straight women they were our audience and then came the gay for pay scene and totally blew all that out of wack. Now we have openly gay men competeing for Top dollar for gay for pay models we have made the shift from being powerful and having and industry to opening the door to people who spit in our face but are willing to earn a paycheck off our community. We blow up their egos destroy our community piece by piece we have turned everything we do into a fetish. It went from gay sex to I won&#8217;t have sex with blacks,I won&#8217;t have sex with Asians and Latins,He can only suck me off,He can&#8217;t fuck me,Some one brought up the cd industry and only liking a few songs.When you were buying music you were buying a concept and entire concept this song by song crap is stupid you have a bunch of ipods with pieces of someone&#8217;s work. What happened to listening to the entire album and understanding what the music meant. Now every one is trying to sell HITS.That&#8217;s what&#8217;s happening to Porn Your being told gay for pay is a hit. Straight men fucking men is hotter than gay men fucking men.You have all with your stupid marketable fetishes and predjudices have made barebacking an industry again. Why is bareback so popular again. Because alot of men feel that it&#8217;s the only place where they can be sure that Gay men are actually having gay sex.No race issues and gay for pay. It&#8217;s sad really we took away the thing that made us powerful and gave it away and in it&#8217;s place sprung something dangerous that was just killing us a decade or 2 at rising numbers. I could care less about these straight for pay assholes. I want quality porn with gay men. Stop trying to sell me a HIT to line your wallet. I want a concept that doesn&#8217;t make me feel less that I&#8217;m a gay man. Like the asshole who used to beat me up when I was kid can now fuck me if I count out the correct amount of money from my wallet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/11/18/straight-guys-gay-porn-men-mag-responds/comment-page-2/#comment-6565</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 23:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/?p=4043#comment-6565</guid>
		<description>Going strong?  GOING...going...gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Going strong?  GOING&#8230;going&#8230;gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/11/18/straight-guys-gay-porn-men-mag-responds/comment-page-2/#comment-6597</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/?p=4043#comment-6597</guid>
		<description>Why do people keep saying ‚Äúoh so and so‚Äù sexuality isn‚Äôt an issue and it‚Äôs nobody‚Äôs business but their own.‚Äù and ‚Äúit doesn‚Äôt matter who the fuck in their private life.‚Äù That whole argument is totally invalid, because it is the performers and the sites that make the sexuality of the model an issue. Not me. I never asked Vince or Reese or whoever what their sexuality was, THEY divulged it. THEY made their own private lives the issue, They are the ones who keep talking about how straight they are, how on Randy‚Äôs site they explain how this their first time being with a guy and how ‚Äúnervous‚Äù they are.

The models are the ones who drag their own private sexuality into the equation. If they are ‚Äúonly playing a part‚Äù then leave their private sexuality at home and play the part.  The models are the ones who shout out about their girlfriends and their desire to fuck Victoria Secret Models in store changing rooms. I never asked them for that private information. So THEY are to ones who make their heterosexuality and issue. Not  any ones else. So when they make it an issue and some people get pissed off with it, they comeback with ‚Äúprivate sexuality is irrelevant‚Äù well if it‚Äôs fucking irrelevant stop banging on about it every five minutes then. You talk about labels, but it is the models and the sites that label themselves, how can I label some I don&#039;t know? I am only going by the information these models give us, they label themselves as straight, I then react to that.

Secondly I think the idea of ‚Äúobjectifying‚Äù a person is very harmful and demoralizing. I personally cannot objectify Reese or any of the other models that appear in MEN as just skin and bone. I can not just look at them, especially when, like Reese, he has put so much of he private personality out there. I think it is the objectifying of people which has led to the awful increase of bareback porn, that and the huge amount of gay for pay or straight for pay, or just in general the ‚Äústraightening out‚Äù of gay porn. Guys are not thinking about these peoples lives because they are objectifying them in you sex dolls, so they jerk ff and then turn off, and don‚Äôt give a fuck about these people. They don‚Äôt care some 19 year old might be positive now, because they‚Äôve objectified them into just a sex fantasy.

I mean Chichi LaRue is saying that herself, but to sell Blake Riley going straight, she‚Äôs all, ‚Äúwell it‚Äôs only a fantasy, it‚Äòs not real‚Äù so she is contradicting herself. Gay porn has just become so screwed up, so messy and un-sexy and it‚Äôs lost all it‚Äôs fun and sexuality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do people keep saying ‚Äúoh so and so‚Äù sexuality isn‚Äôt an issue and it‚Äôs nobody‚Äôs business but their own.‚Äù and ‚Äúit doesn‚Äôt matter who the fuck in their private life.‚Äù That whole argument is totally invalid, because it is the performers and the sites that make the sexuality of the model an issue. Not me. I never asked Vince or Reese or whoever what their sexuality was, THEY divulged it. THEY made their own private lives the issue, They are the ones who keep talking about how straight they are, how on Randy‚Äôs site they explain how this their first time being with a guy and how ‚Äúnervous‚Äù they are.</p>
<p>The models are the ones who drag their own private sexuality into the equation. If they are ‚Äúonly playing a part‚Äù then leave their private sexuality at home and play the part.  The models are the ones who shout out about their girlfriends and their desire to fuck Victoria Secret Models in store changing rooms. I never asked them for that private information. So THEY are to ones who make their heterosexuality and issue. Not  any ones else. So when they make it an issue and some people get pissed off with it, they comeback with ‚Äúprivate sexuality is irrelevant‚Äù well if it‚Äôs fucking irrelevant stop banging on about it every five minutes then. You talk about labels, but it is the models and the sites that label themselves, how can I label some I don&#8217;t know? I am only going by the information these models give us, they label themselves as straight, I then react to that.</p>
<p>Secondly I think the idea of ‚Äúobjectifying‚Äù a person is very harmful and demoralizing. I personally cannot objectify Reese or any of the other models that appear in MEN as just skin and bone. I can not just look at them, especially when, like Reese, he has put so much of he private personality out there. I think it is the objectifying of people which has led to the awful increase of bareback porn, that and the huge amount of gay for pay or straight for pay, or just in general the ‚Äústraightening out‚Äù of gay porn. Guys are not thinking about these peoples lives because they are objectifying them in you sex dolls, so they jerk ff and then turn off, and don‚Äôt give a fuck about these people. They don‚Äôt care some 19 year old might be positive now, because they‚Äôve objectified them into just a sex fantasy.</p>
<p>I mean Chichi LaRue is saying that herself, but to sell Blake Riley going straight, she‚Äôs all, ‚Äúwell it‚Äôs only a fantasy, it‚Äòs not real‚Äù so she is contradicting herself. Gay porn has just become so screwed up, so messy and un-sexy and it‚Äôs lost all it‚Äôs fun and sexuality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elmysterio</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/11/18/straight-guys-gay-porn-men-mag-responds/comment-page-2/#comment-6524</link>
		<dc:creator>elmysterio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 03:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/?p=4043#comment-6524</guid>
		<description>MoJo you so get it. The real deal in all of this is that it is just labels. If we let the world label us then we can be catagorized. The fact is we are all men and that is really the only label we need. Who we fuck should not define us. Who we love should not define us. What we do should not define us. The only person who can define me is me and I defy discription.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MoJo you so get it. The real deal in all of this is that it is just labels. If we let the world label us then we can be catagorized. The fact is we are all men and that is really the only label we need. Who we fuck should not define us. Who we love should not define us. What we do should not define us. The only person who can define me is me and I defy discription.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoJo</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/11/18/straight-guys-gay-porn-men-mag-responds/comment-page-2/#comment-6596</link>
		<dc:creator>MoJo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/?p=4043#comment-6596</guid>
		<description>Perhaps, it&#039;s about willingess to perform. A straight identified guy theoretically doesn&#039;t live a &quot;gay&quot; life so having &quot;gay&quot; sex on camera is just acting, and lets face it, sex on a stage in front of a crew being told what to do and how to do it, cannot be the same thing as sex for pleasure in a private setting with someone you have feelings for. A &quot;gay&quot; identified guy is in a way bearing his soul when he has sex on camera and for him there is a little less acting involved, this could make him more sensative to negative comments, because there&#039;s a little bit of the real him in those images and pictures. This could explain why straight identified men don&#039;t do straight porn because then they would be showing some of their identified selves.  When you think about it, many of the &quot;gay&quot; stars are somewhat guarded about their real lives and can come across as more &quot;straight&quot; than the &quot;straight&quot; stars, this could be because the &quot;straight&quot; stars are always &quot;acting&quot;.

One more thought, the magazines and production companies take on the &quot;personalities&quot; of the people who run them, and tend to showcase the &quot;fantasies&quot; (or Fetishes) of these people, this could explain why Men magazine uses cookie cutter models that look so similar, or why Chi Chi&#039;s movies always seem to showcase a particular &quot;type&quot; (Twinkish) of guy, or why Ragging Stallion movies almost all look the same with their (angry, semi-violent) type. I think perhaps Falcon is the biggest offender but they&#039;ve gotten better in the last few years. it&#039;s only when the companies start being run like a &quot;business&quot; and less like a personal fetish does their product begin to contain more bredth and depth - in my opinion Titan is possibly the best at this from a model selection point of view, they have a very diverse (visually) group even if their movies themselves often look the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps, it&#8217;s about willingess to perform. A straight identified guy theoretically doesn&#8217;t live a &#8220;gay&#8221; life so having &#8220;gay&#8221; sex on camera is just acting, and lets face it, sex on a stage in front of a crew being told what to do and how to do it, cannot be the same thing as sex for pleasure in a private setting with someone you have feelings for. A &#8220;gay&#8221; identified guy is in a way bearing his soul when he has sex on camera and for him there is a little less acting involved, this could make him more sensative to negative comments, because there&#8217;s a little bit of the real him in those images and pictures. This could explain why straight identified men don&#8217;t do straight porn because then they would be showing some of their identified selves.  When you think about it, many of the &#8220;gay&#8221; stars are somewhat guarded about their real lives and can come across as more &#8220;straight&#8221; than the &#8220;straight&#8221; stars, this could be because the &#8220;straight&#8221; stars are always &#8220;acting&#8221;.</p>
<p>One more thought, the magazines and production companies take on the &#8220;personalities&#8221; of the people who run them, and tend to showcase the &#8220;fantasies&#8221; (or Fetishes) of these people, this could explain why Men magazine uses cookie cutter models that look so similar, or why Chi Chi&#8217;s movies always seem to showcase a particular &#8220;type&#8221; (Twinkish) of guy, or why Ragging Stallion movies almost all look the same with their (angry, semi-violent) type. I think perhaps Falcon is the biggest offender but they&#8217;ve gotten better in the last few years. it&#8217;s only when the companies start being run like a &#8220;business&#8221; and less like a personal fetish does their product begin to contain more bredth and depth &#8211; in my opinion Titan is possibly the best at this from a model selection point of view, they have a very diverse (visually) group even if their movies themselves often look the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoJo</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/11/18/straight-guys-gay-porn-men-mag-responds/comment-page-2/#comment-6595</link>
		<dc:creator>MoJo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 07:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/?p=4043#comment-6595</guid>
		<description>Wow, there are so many angles to this conversation... usually these blogs are boring and a little stupid (no hate, just how I feel) but this one is indeed different, so I&#039;ll throw in my two cents. Gay, Straight, Bi.. they are just labels, that when coming from a production company just don&#039;t really mean anything. Most of us know what we like visually, the body as art, if you will. No one else can define what &quot;straight&quot; means to you, or to me and this is the reason for the  controversy. Some think &quot;straight&quot; equates to who you have sex with, while other think it equates to who you love. either can be valid, but it&#039;s an individual thing. So when a magazine or production company labels someone they must understand that the label they choose does not have just one meaning to all people. IMHO (in my humble opinion) the companies should just do away with the labels and present the men as living art.  To me a man posing or performing naked without contact with another man is neither gay or straight because it just doesn&#039;t matter, but it does seem odd to call a man straight when he has sex with other men. the label doesn&#039;t fit, it&#039;s kind of like showing me a tomato and telling me it&#039;s blue, but I see red. It&#039;s been said that men are visual creatures, and there really is no difference between the way straight and gay men look, no matter how you define the labels, to this point these magazines and production companies should just pick the good looking people who are willing to perform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, there are so many angles to this conversation&#8230; usually these blogs are boring and a little stupid (no hate, just how I feel) but this one is indeed different, so I&#8217;ll throw in my two cents. Gay, Straight, Bi.. they are just labels, that when coming from a production company just don&#8217;t really mean anything. Most of us know what we like visually, the body as art, if you will. No one else can define what &#8220;straight&#8221; means to you, or to me and this is the reason for the  controversy. Some think &#8220;straight&#8221; equates to who you have sex with, while other think it equates to who you love. either can be valid, but it&#8217;s an individual thing. So when a magazine or production company labels someone they must understand that the label they choose does not have just one meaning to all people. IMHO (in my humble opinion) the companies should just do away with the labels and present the men as living art.  To me a man posing or performing naked without contact with another man is neither gay or straight because it just doesn&#8217;t matter, but it does seem odd to call a man straight when he has sex with other men. the label doesn&#8217;t fit, it&#8217;s kind of like showing me a tomato and telling me it&#8217;s blue, but I see red. It&#8217;s been said that men are visual creatures, and there really is no difference between the way straight and gay men look, no matter how you define the labels, to this point these magazines and production companies should just pick the good looking people who are willing to perform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/11/18/straight-guys-gay-porn-men-mag-responds/comment-page-2/#comment-6594</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/?p=4043#comment-6594</guid>
		<description>Absolutely agree Alex, this is the only visual medium were gay men are not subjugate or degraded, well one would think. Unfortunately it is not true, gay men in our own ‚Äúbackyard‚Äù as it were are still rejected in favour of straight men. No wonder we don‚Äôt seem to be earning respect from the wider straight culture, how can we don‚Äôt even respect ourselves to begin with?

Those men who exploit this, (and it is undeniably exploitation, no matter how hard Randy Blue and his cohorts try to defend it) are reprehensible bigots who, while not only exploiting internalised homophobia and self-hate but supporting and encouraging it for money and that is unreservedly horrible and shameful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely agree Alex, this is the only visual medium were gay men are not subjugate or degraded, well one would think. Unfortunately it is not true, gay men in our own ‚Äúbackyard‚Äù as it were are still rejected in favour of straight men. No wonder we don‚Äôt seem to be earning respect from the wider straight culture, how can we don‚Äôt even respect ourselves to begin with?</p>
<p>Those men who exploit this, (and it is undeniably exploitation, no matter how hard Randy Blue and his cohorts try to defend it) are reprehensible bigots who, while not only exploiting internalised homophobia and self-hate but supporting and encouraging it for money and that is unreservedly horrible and shameful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Sarmiento</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/11/18/straight-guys-gay-porn-men-mag-responds/comment-page-2/#comment-6593</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Sarmiento</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/?p=4043#comment-6593</guid>
		<description>I love me my gay porn, but I can&#039;t stand straight guys in gay porn. To me, gay porn is more than just titilation. It&#039;s sacrosanct. It&#039;s perhaps the only venue (legitimate or otherwise) where gay male sexuality is celebrated. No one&#039;s gay-bashed, no one&#039;s chased to the top of a cliff and beaten a la Suddenly Last Summer, no one is the asexual gay best friend, and no one is the sympathetic gay person who dies in the end. We still live in a world where homosexuality is viewed as immoral, perverse, and fodder for ridicule. To me, gay male porn stars are to be celebrated for making people comfortable with their sexuality, not denigrated for being &quot;embarassments&quot; while we fight for gay rights. Yes, it is porn... but it&#039;s OUR PORN, and I wouldn&#039;t trade it for any other porn in the world! Seeing straight guys invade gay porn in unprecedented waves is saddening. Give me gay or bisexual (real bisexuals like Caesar, and not the male equivalents of Stupid Spoiled Whore Video Playset Katy &quot;I Kissed A Girl&quot; Perry Girls Gone Wild) male porn stars over Reese Rideout and Chris Rockaway any day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love me my gay porn, but I can&#8217;t stand straight guys in gay porn. To me, gay porn is more than just titilation. It&#8217;s sacrosanct. It&#8217;s perhaps the only venue (legitimate or otherwise) where gay male sexuality is celebrated. No one&#8217;s gay-bashed, no one&#8217;s chased to the top of a cliff and beaten a la Suddenly Last Summer, no one is the asexual gay best friend, and no one is the sympathetic gay person who dies in the end. We still live in a world where homosexuality is viewed as immoral, perverse, and fodder for ridicule. To me, gay male porn stars are to be celebrated for making people comfortable with their sexuality, not denigrated for being &#8220;embarassments&#8221; while we fight for gay rights. Yes, it is porn&#8230; but it&#8217;s OUR PORN, and I wouldn&#8217;t trade it for any other porn in the world! Seeing straight guys invade gay porn in unprecedented waves is saddening. Give me gay or bisexual (real bisexuals like Caesar, and not the male equivalents of Stupid Spoiled Whore Video Playset Katy &#8220;I Kissed A Girl&#8221; Perry Girls Gone Wild) male porn stars over Reese Rideout and Chris Rockaway any day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elmysterio</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/11/18/straight-guys-gay-porn-men-mag-responds/comment-page-2/#comment-6592</link>
		<dc:creator>elmysterio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/?p=4043#comment-6592</guid>
		<description>The real issue here is the consumers of gay porn who are in fact the blame for what we are having shoved down our collective throats. This is not a new issue it has been there for years. I remember the whole thing with John Holmes, Jack Wrangler, Jeff  Quinn, Ryan Idol, Rex Chandler, Jeff Stryker, Rod Barry, and Jason Crew just to name some of the models that have been labeled with gay for pay. This is not something new it has been around for as long as gay porn. Yet now we choose to make a stink about it.

There are some iconic gay porn models but what is sad is that most of them are all dead. But that is a different subject that what we are currently discussing but the two go hand in hand. The producers of gay porn would not be using ‚Äústraight models‚Äù if there were no demand for them. So lets face it we as consumers have sent a message to the producers that this is what we want to see. We get upset about it but we continue to buy the product that has ‚ÄúGay for pay‚Äù models in it.

So lets look at the whole ‚ÄúGay for Pay‚Äù phenomena. Why is it that this occurred? Who was the one who thought they we could make gay porn using ‚ÄúStraight guys‚Äù? Why did they come up with that idea? In my opinion it was because we as gay men have always been bombarded with what the ‚Äústraight community‚Äù has considered sexy. You have to remember that we had those Marlboro, Bounty paper towel and Mr. Clean commercials and Madison Avenue and Hollywood telling us what was sexy. You rarely would see a gay porn actor who was fashioned after Paul Lynn from Bewitched because he was just a little to queenie for most of us to consider sexy.

Face it we have all been sucked into that whole machismo thing and we are not that accepting of gay men who do not fit that image. Now me personally, I do not think that ‚Äúgay for pay‚Äù is such a bad thing because I don‚Äôt see the models as ‚Äústraight‚Äù. They are having sex with men so that by default makes them bisexual.
So the whole gay for pay thing is a myth. The real issue here is that there are too many companies who are now producing gay porn that is not good. And it does not matter whether the model is gay or straight it still sucks.

This is not a cultural thing, it is all about the dollar and it always has been. So in my opinion you should be more pissed off about them producing bad porn than them using‚Äùstraight‚Äùmodels gay in porn. The other issue with the porn industry is that just like any other industry it is the content and quality. This has hit the Music industry as well. Why buy a CD when there are maybe 2 songs you like on the whole thing when you can just buy the singles and be happy. The same goes for porn the DVD at $50.00 that has one-maybe two scenes on it and the rest is filler. The question is do you spend $50.00 dollars on a DVD or do you join a website for $40.00 and pick and choose what you like.

The fact that there is so much anger surrounding this issue is a bit strange to me because like I said there is no such thing as ‚Äúgay for pay‚Äù. The fact is that so many of us have real issues with our sexuality is the real basis for this discussion. Just like the whole stink about Brent Corrigan being seventeen when he did his first porn thus making those scenes kiddy porn. The issues that so many had with resigning themselves to the fact that they got off on that shit. That is the same problem that many are having with the whole ‚ÄúGay for Pay‚Äù thing. How can I be aroused by a ‚Äústraight man‚Äù having gay sex? Well the fact is kiddies we have all had fantasies about straight men and now when it is shown to us on video we get upset.

Porn has never been about a story line, it is all about the action and that action needs to be hot and the big studios have not seemed to figure that one out yet. Now if they really want to make money off of the DVD sales they need to do compilations of the hottest scenes ever shot and sell that shit and leave the fluff and the filler on the cutting room floor. Just as I have said that the gay community needs to examine itself so does the porn industry. As soon as we realize our shortcomings and correct them it will be better for us all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real issue here is the consumers of gay porn who are in fact the blame for what we are having shoved down our collective throats. This is not a new issue it has been there for years. I remember the whole thing with John Holmes, Jack Wrangler, Jeff  Quinn, Ryan Idol, Rex Chandler, Jeff Stryker, Rod Barry, and Jason Crew just to name some of the models that have been labeled with gay for pay. This is not something new it has been around for as long as gay porn. Yet now we choose to make a stink about it.</p>
<p>There are some iconic gay porn models but what is sad is that most of them are all dead. But that is a different subject that what we are currently discussing but the two go hand in hand. The producers of gay porn would not be using ‚Äústraight models‚Äù if there were no demand for them. So lets face it we as consumers have sent a message to the producers that this is what we want to see. We get upset about it but we continue to buy the product that has ‚ÄúGay for pay‚Äù models in it.</p>
<p>So lets look at the whole ‚ÄúGay for Pay‚Äù phenomena. Why is it that this occurred? Who was the one who thought they we could make gay porn using ‚ÄúStraight guys‚Äù? Why did they come up with that idea? In my opinion it was because we as gay men have always been bombarded with what the ‚Äústraight community‚Äù has considered sexy. You have to remember that we had those Marlboro, Bounty paper towel and Mr. Clean commercials and Madison Avenue and Hollywood telling us what was sexy. You rarely would see a gay porn actor who was fashioned after Paul Lynn from Bewitched because he was just a little to queenie for most of us to consider sexy.</p>
<p>Face it we have all been sucked into that whole machismo thing and we are not that accepting of gay men who do not fit that image. Now me personally, I do not think that ‚Äúgay for pay‚Äù is such a bad thing because I don‚Äôt see the models as ‚Äústraight‚Äù. They are having sex with men so that by default makes them bisexual.<br />
So the whole gay for pay thing is a myth. The real issue here is that there are too many companies who are now producing gay porn that is not good. And it does not matter whether the model is gay or straight it still sucks.</p>
<p>This is not a cultural thing, it is all about the dollar and it always has been. So in my opinion you should be more pissed off about them producing bad porn than them using‚Äùstraight‚Äùmodels gay in porn. The other issue with the porn industry is that just like any other industry it is the content and quality. This has hit the Music industry as well. Why buy a CD when there are maybe 2 songs you like on the whole thing when you can just buy the singles and be happy. The same goes for porn the DVD at $50.00 that has one-maybe two scenes on it and the rest is filler. The question is do you spend $50.00 dollars on a DVD or do you join a website for $40.00 and pick and choose what you like.</p>
<p>The fact that there is so much anger surrounding this issue is a bit strange to me because like I said there is no such thing as ‚Äúgay for pay‚Äù. The fact is that so many of us have real issues with our sexuality is the real basis for this discussion. Just like the whole stink about Brent Corrigan being seventeen when he did his first porn thus making those scenes kiddy porn. The issues that so many had with resigning themselves to the fact that they got off on that shit. That is the same problem that many are having with the whole ‚ÄúGay for Pay‚Äù thing. How can I be aroused by a ‚Äústraight man‚Äù having gay sex? Well the fact is kiddies we have all had fantasies about straight men and now when it is shown to us on video we get upset.</p>
<p>Porn has never been about a story line, it is all about the action and that action needs to be hot and the big studios have not seemed to figure that one out yet. Now if they really want to make money off of the DVD sales they need to do compilations of the hottest scenes ever shot and sell that shit and leave the fluff and the filler on the cutting room floor. Just as I have said that the gay community needs to examine itself so does the porn industry. As soon as we realize our shortcomings and correct them it will be better for us all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/11/18/straight-guys-gay-porn-men-mag-responds/comment-page-2/#comment-6591</link>
		<dc:creator>P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/?p=4043#comment-6591</guid>
		<description>&quot;Vince Ferelli, a new model, comes close to Reese. Not in body type or looks, but he has a sense about being a straight guy in gay porn. He takes it all in stride. It‚Äôs a job and Vince loves what he‚Äôs doing.&quot;


Oh! wow another straight guy gets pushed up forward and hailed as the best new thing in gay porn, get me a sick bag, I think I need to vomit, right before I fall over with utter boredom, no wonder so many gay guys are watch straight porn, gay porn is being killed.

And here is the punch line, the response for gay sites to this, is not actually to try and make better gay porn an fix the shit they are doing wrong, but make the gay model go straight and make straight. It&#039;s BATSHIT crazy. Sorry but if I want to watch straight porn, I&#039;ll watch Charles Dera not some lame idiotically conceived bad ‚Äúgay straight porn‚Äù made out of total desperation, laziness and greed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Vince Ferelli, a new model, comes close to Reese. Not in body type or looks, but he has a sense about being a straight guy in gay porn. He takes it all in stride. It‚Äôs a job and Vince loves what he‚Äôs doing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh! wow another straight guy gets pushed up forward and hailed as the best new thing in gay porn, get me a sick bag, I think I need to vomit, right before I fall over with utter boredom, no wonder so many gay guys are watch straight porn, gay porn is being killed.</p>
<p>And here is the punch line, the response for gay sites to this, is not actually to try and make better gay porn an fix the shit they are doing wrong, but make the gay model go straight and make straight. It&#8217;s BATSHIT crazy. Sorry but if I want to watch straight porn, I&#8217;ll watch Charles Dera not some lame idiotically conceived bad ‚Äúgay straight porn‚Äù made out of total desperation, laziness and greed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elmysterio</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/11/18/straight-guys-gay-porn-men-mag-responds/comment-page-2/#comment-6590</link>
		<dc:creator>elmysterio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 07:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/?p=4043#comment-6590</guid>
		<description>Jon you speak allot of truth in your comment and I agree with you. Especilly on the race issue. It is hard to find black models and hard to find white models to work with them and you are correct that some black models won&#039;t work with other black models. That just totally proves my point about the gay community. Before we can expect others to accept us we have to accept ourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon you speak allot of truth in your comment and I agree with you. Especilly on the race issue. It is hard to find black models and hard to find white models to work with them and you are correct that some black models won&#8217;t work with other black models. That just totally proves my point about the gay community. Before we can expect others to accept us we have to accept ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Royce</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/11/18/straight-guys-gay-porn-men-mag-responds/comment-page-2/#comment-6589</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Royce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 02:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/?p=4043#comment-6589</guid>
		<description>What a great debate.
It was nearly three years ago that Reese Rideout contact me about shooting for my MightyMen.Com site.  He wasn&#039;t the first straight guy and won&#039;t be the last.  He was the most prepared and focused model I&#039;ve ever worked with.  He was competent.  Made his own travel arrangements (from west coast to east).  Wanted to do a good job.  Didn&#039;t drink, didn&#039;t smoke, no drugs.  Focused on the work.  He had everything thought out.  Told me exactly what he would do with another guy and what he wouldn&#039;t without being offensive (at that time he would just get sucked).  He was the best performer I&#039;ve ever worked with.  Reese understood that he was in front of the camera.  He wanted good references from me when he applied with other companies.  I&#039;d love to find more models like Reese (I have but not that many).  Vince Ferelli, a new model, comes close to Reese.  Not in body type or looks, but he has a sense about being a straight guy in gay porn.  He takes it all in stride.  It&#039;s a job and Vince loves what he&#039;s doing.

Other straight guys that have come through my doors have been complete jerks.  They have no clue as to what is going on.  They thing they just have to lay there and stroke their cocks.  I&#039;ve interviewed other straight guys that have been insulting to gays and they don&#039;t make the cut.

Reese is a success because he does a good job.  He takes his job serious.  He doesn&#039;t complain.  He wants to work and gives it his all.

Was Eric McCormack gay for pay?

About black guys.  I love black guys.  One of the hardest things about shooting a video with black guys is the white guys.  Try finding a white guy that will work with a black guy.  I&#039;ve had black guys tell me they won&#039;t work with other black guys.  I&#039;m going to keep looking.

Great conversation.  Keep it up, J.C.
Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great debate.<br />
It was nearly three years ago that Reese Rideout contact me about shooting for my MightyMen.Com site.  He wasn&#8217;t the first straight guy and won&#8217;t be the last.  He was the most prepared and focused model I&#8217;ve ever worked with.  He was competent.  Made his own travel arrangements (from west coast to east).  Wanted to do a good job.  Didn&#8217;t drink, didn&#8217;t smoke, no drugs.  Focused on the work.  He had everything thought out.  Told me exactly what he would do with another guy and what he wouldn&#8217;t without being offensive (at that time he would just get sucked).  He was the best performer I&#8217;ve ever worked with.  Reese understood that he was in front of the camera.  He wanted good references from me when he applied with other companies.  I&#8217;d love to find more models like Reese (I have but not that many).  Vince Ferelli, a new model, comes close to Reese.  Not in body type or looks, but he has a sense about being a straight guy in gay porn.  He takes it all in stride.  It&#8217;s a job and Vince loves what he&#8217;s doing.</p>
<p>Other straight guys that have come through my doors have been complete jerks.  They have no clue as to what is going on.  They thing they just have to lay there and stroke their cocks.  I&#8217;ve interviewed other straight guys that have been insulting to gays and they don&#8217;t make the cut.</p>
<p>Reese is a success because he does a good job.  He takes his job serious.  He doesn&#8217;t complain.  He wants to work and gives it his all.</p>
<p>Was Eric McCormack gay for pay?</p>
<p>About black guys.  I love black guys.  One of the hardest things about shooting a video with black guys is the white guys.  Try finding a white guy that will work with a black guy.  I&#8217;ve had black guys tell me they won&#8217;t work with other black guys.  I&#8217;m going to keep looking.</p>
<p>Great conversation.  Keep it up, J.C.<br />
Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P</title>
		<link>http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/2008/11/18/straight-guys-gay-porn-men-mag-responds/comment-page-2/#comment-6588</link>
		<dc:creator>P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 22:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gayporntimes.com/hardnews/?p=4043#comment-6588</guid>
		<description>MEN is a wank rag that ends up cum stained in the trash a week later, I take a bigger issue and am much more offended by legit gay lifestyle magazines like the highly odious and hateful DNA, which I think is shameful, a gay lifestyle magazine that NEVER puts a gay model on it&#039;s cover, instead sickeningly playing up to the &quot;Gorgeous Straight Man&quot; as some icon image of social, moral and physical perfection. And reinforcing the homophobic stereotype that gay men lust after and have predatory sexual tendencies towards straight men.

MEN, also does this as grotesquely as DNA, however MEN is a jo rag, so I don&#039;t use it any way to value the worth of my sexuality, don&#039;t misunderstand me, I do think MEN and gay for pay are offensive and degrading toward gay men and would never support such a product as demoting as MEN.

I generally find gay men&#039;s magazines to be very patronizing and homophobic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MEN is a wank rag that ends up cum stained in the trash a week later, I take a bigger issue and am much more offended by legit gay lifestyle magazines like the highly odious and hateful DNA, which I think is shameful, a gay lifestyle magazine that NEVER puts a gay model on it&#8217;s cover, instead sickeningly playing up to the &#8220;Gorgeous Straight Man&#8221; as some icon image of social, moral and physical perfection. And reinforcing the homophobic stereotype that gay men lust after and have predatory sexual tendencies towards straight men.</p>
<p>MEN, also does this as grotesquely as DNA, however MEN is a jo rag, so I don&#8217;t use it any way to value the worth of my sexuality, don&#8217;t misunderstand me, I do think MEN and gay for pay are offensive and degrading toward gay men and would never support such a product as demoting as MEN.</p>
<p>I generally find gay men&#8217;s magazines to be very patronizing and homophobic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

